<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The ratios of earnings to hours are not the same each week, so the earnings do not vary directly with the hours.
<h2>
Step-by-step explanation:</h2>
We know that the data points given by (x,y) are in direct variation if:
for each (x,y)
We are given data as:
Caleb’s Earnings Hours(x) 12 15 18 21
Earnings (in dollars)(y) 140 170 200 230
So, we could see the ratio as:
Hence, we could see that each ratio are not equal.
Hence, the relationship between the earnings and the number of hours does not represents a direct variation.
11!/4!2! = 39916800/24(2)= 831600
<span> </span> <span>sorry if this answer <span>wrong
</span></span>
Answer:
V(t) = 25000 * (0.815)^t
The depreciation from year 3 to year 4 was $2503.71
Step-by-step explanation:
We can model V(t) as an exponencial function:
V(t) = Vo * (1+r)^t
Where Vo is the inicial value of the car, r is the depreciation rate and t is the amount of years.
We have that Vo = 25000, r = -18.5% = -0.185, so:
V(t) = 25000 * (1-0.185)^t
V(t) = 25000 * (0.815)^t
In year 3, we have:
V(3) = 25000 * (0.815)^3 = 13533.58
In year 4, we have:
V(4) = 25000 * (0.815)^4 = 11029.87
The depreciation from year 3 to year 4 was:
V(3) - V(4) = 13533.58 - 11029.87 = $2503.71
Answer: B
Step-by-step explanation:
The second power basically means that you multiply the number by itself that many times depending on the power, and since it's 50^2, the answer is Caleb - 100 | Jenna - 2,500. (Tip: Just multiply 50 x 50)
