Answer: Her childhood predisposed her to dislike change.
Explanation:
Mental schemas or mental frameworks are the conceptual frameworks that help us interpret the world, are generated throughout life and start from experiences lived and learned. Each person develops different mental frameworks because the lived experiences are individual. Therefore, a situation can be considered as positive, another person can consider the same situation negatively.
<em>In this case, due to the moving experience that Miriam lived during her childhood, she interprets the changes or changes of the environment in a negative way, that is why she must have a predisposition not to like the changes.</em>
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
I believe the answer is: single parenthood and abortion
Single parents would most likely create a massive hindrance in the teenage's future since their time would be divided between pursuing their economic needs and taking care of the kid. Abortion raises an ethical issues among people who see lives started as soon as the fetus is formed.
The answer is: Respect and protect nature.
The theme respect and protect nature is usually used by the writers if they focused on educating the readers regarding the importance of maintaining the proper condition of our environment. Putting giant birds as characters that pick up trash to protect the environment is made to appeal to the readers' emotion so they do not repeat the same behavior.
Answer:
c. Designing the survey so that subjects are not forced to answer one question before going to the next.
Explanation:
A researcher while conducting specific research asks the participants which he or she has been chosen for the purposed of research to sign the informed consent in which the researcher has mention the terms and conditions and brief description about a particular study.
In an informed consent, a researcher should mention that the participant's information will be kept confidential and hence they can withdraw from the research whenever they want. They have the liability of answering questions and skipping them if they want to. In short, the researcher should follow the ethical guidelines.
I would go with a political conflict, because it came as a result of a longstanding social dilemma.
