What is the sources of error and suggestion on how to overcome it in the hooke's law experiment?
1 answer:
In physics, Hooke's law is written in equation as:
F = kx
It states that the force F exerted on the spring is directly proportional to the displacement x by a constant called spring constant k.
In the laboratory, this is done in an experiment through the apparatus shown in the attached figure. The object experimented here is the spring, and you are to find the spring constant. A known mass of object is attached below the spring. That object carries a force in the form of gravitational pull in terms of weight. When the spring stretches, the displacement is measured with the use of the ruler.
There are a number of sources of error for this experiment. First, the reading from the ruler by the reader may be inaccurate. That's why digital balances are much more reliable because it minimizes human error. Reading the measurement on the ruler is subjective especially when you don't read it on eye level. Second, the force of the object might also be inaccurate if you use an unreliable weighing scale. Lastly, the apparatus might not be properly calibrated.
F = kx
It states that the force F exerted on the spring is directly proportional to the displacement x by a constant called spring constant k.
In the laboratory, this is done in an experiment through the apparatus shown in the attached figure. The object experimented here is the spring, and you are to find the spring constant. A known mass of object is attached below the spring. That object carries a force in the form of gravitational pull in terms of weight. When the spring stretches, the displacement is measured with the use of the ruler.
There are a number of sources of error for this experiment. First, the reading from the ruler by the reader may be inaccurate. That's why digital balances are much more reliable because it minimizes human error. Reading the measurement on the ruler is subjective especially when you don't read it on eye level. Second, the force of the object might also be inaccurate if you use an unreliable weighing scale. Lastly, the apparatus might not be properly calibrated.
You might be interested in
Answer:
B will take 1.034 times the time of A from Boston to Hartford.
Explanation:
Let the distance from Boston to Hartford be S.
Person A drives at a constant speed of 55 mph for the entire trip,
Time taken by person A
Person B drives at 65 mph for half the distance and then drives 45 mph for the second half of the distance.
Time taken by person B
Ratio of time of arrival of B to A
B will take 1.034 times the time of A from Boston to Hartford.
Answer:
1.034m/s
Explanation:
We define the two moments to develop the problem. The first before the collision will be determined by the center of velocity mass, while the second by the momentum preservation. Our values are given by,
<em>Part A)</em> We apply the center of mass for velocity in this case, the equation is given by,
Substituting,
Part B)
For the Part B we need to apply conserving momentum equation, this formula is given by,
Where here is the velocity after the collision.
Answer:
From the relation above we can conclude that the as the distance between the two plate increases the electric field strength decreases
Explanation:
I cannot find any attached photo, but we can proceed anyways theoretically.
The electric field strength (E) at any point in an electric field is the force experienced by a unit positive charge (Q) at that point
i.e
But the force F
But the electric field intensity due to a point charge Q at a distance r meters away is given by
<em>From the relation above we can conclude that the as the distance between the two plate increases the electric field strength decreases</em>