Answer:
Expectancy theory
Explanation:
Expectancy theory works on the basis that the premise on which employees may base an individual levels of effort will be on what is necessary to perform well and earn rewards within the workplace. In other words if retish wants her workers to put forth a certain level of effort and therefore be motivated to reach a particular goal, she would have to set up a reward structure with clearly defining goals and routine evaluations.
The best evaluation would be that the statement is invalid because we cannot be sure if the argument is referring to the same <span>provost. The whole paragraph is a fallacy. It was not directly stated that James Hoopster was the provost who saved the university from crisis. It just so happened that James Hoopster took the same path as to the provost who saved the university.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": That the oral agreement fell outside the statute of frauds if the plaintiff satisfied the main-purpose doctrine.
Explanation:
<em>Power Entertainment Inc. </em>sued <em>National Football League Properties Inc.</em>(NFLP), saying the other party violated an oral agreement to allow it to assume a third party debt if the other party would allow it to acquire valuable third party business licenses previously held. The Court of Appeals ruled that fraud status did not apply in such cases in Texas, the state where it all took place.
The third alternative is the most correct (C).
When opening an account with a financial institution, it is important to read the agreement and policies of the institution to be aware of all fees charged to carry out financial operations and account maintenance.
<u>Some banks charge extra fees, often opportunistically, so it is important to thoroughly read the contract to avoid surprises and stress.</u>
Answer:
c.) hawthorne effect
Explanation:
The Hawthorne effect is regarded as the phenomenon in which the subjects in behavioral studies tend to change their performance in response to being observed.
It is always counter productive in terms of result because it is hard to study when results are biased, the participants knew they were being studied.
Due to the individuals knowledge that they are being studied, most times it produces not exactly the result it should.
