Across the largest side is going to be largest angle, and across the smallest side -smallest angle.
Sides:
BC = 9 < AB = 13 < CA = 17.
Angles that are across sides: A < C < B.
Answer is d- A C B.
Answer:
a) (0.5256,0.5944)
c) Criticism is invalid
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 560
Proportion of mislabeled = 56%
a) 90% Confidence interval:
Putting the values, we get:
b) Interpretation of confidence interval:
We are 90% confident that the true proportion of all seafood in the country that is mislabeled or misidentified is between 0.5256 and 0.5944 that is 52.56% and 59.44%.
c) Validity of criticism
Conditions for validity:
Verification:
Both the conditions are satisfied. This, the criticism is invalid.
Answer:
(See explanation)
Step-by-step explanation:
The function is:
Its simplified form is presented hereafter:
The resultant expression is a linear function, first-order polynomial, whose domain and range are the set of the real numbers.
Answer:
No
It could be purely due to chance.
Step-by-step explanation:
A population is defined as the whole group which has the same characteristics. For example a population of the college belongs to the same college . But a sample may be an element of a population.
So it is not necessary for a population to have the same characteristics as the sample.
But it is essential for the sample to have at least one same characteristics as the population.
So we would not be correct in inferring that such a relationship also exists in the population.
It is a hypothesis which can be true or false due to certain conditions or limitations as the case maybe.
For example in a population of smokers some may be in the habit of taking cocaine. But a sample of cocaine users does not mean the whole population uses it.
It could be purely due to chance if we find out that there is a relationship between parents’ and children’s party identification in the population.
