All categories

2 years ago

Which is not a reason for supporting ethical relativism?

1 answer:

4 0

This is not the reason why not support ethical relativism; Ethical relativism holds that there is a right and wrong, even though we do not agree about what is right and wrong and If people disagree about some moral matter, their disagreement will always be due to their having different moral values.

You might be interested in

You are planning an AD implementation for a company that currently has Sales, Accounting, and Marketing departments. Each depart

netineya [11]

Answer:

Delegation of control

Explanation:

Active Directory (AD) is a product offered by Microsoft that is designed for managing computers and related devices within an intranet. It is part of a larger operating system called Windows Server used in both intranet and internet based servers.

4 0

1 year ago

Chiptech, Inc., is an established computer chip firm with several profitable existing products as well as some promising new pro

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

$11

Explanation:

"The required return for the computer chip industry is 15%, and the company has just gone ex-dividend (i.e., the next dividend will be paid a year from now, at t 1) (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)"

g = ROE*b

g = ROE * (1-Payout ratio)

g = 20% * (1-0.5)

g = 10%

P0 = D1/k-g

P0 = D0(1+g) / k-g

P0 = 0.5(1+0.10) / (0.15+0.10)

P0 = $11

S0, the market price of Chiptech stock is $11

7 0

2 years ago

You are the owner of a local Honda dealership. Unlike other dealerships in the area, you take pride in your "No Haggle" sales po

balu736 [363]

Answer:

$11880

Explanation:

Given that:

In a local Honda Dealership;

Last year, your dealership earned a record profits of $1.5 million

according to the local Chamber of Commerce, your earnings were 10 percent less than either of your competitors.

The Price Elasticity of demand E = - 4.5

Marginal cost of a midsized automobile = $11,000

Let assume that In your market, you compete against two other dealers

From The above given data , the objective is to determine the What price should you charge for a midsized automobile if you expect to maintain your record sales.

So; in order to achieve that ; we consider the scenario of an Oligopoly market by using the markup formula for homogeneous product Cournot Oligopoly which can be represented as:

$P = (\dfrac{n*E}{1+ n*E})*MC$

$P = (\dfrac{3*(-4.5)}{1+(3*-4.5)})*11000$

$P = (\dfrac{-13.5}{1+(-13.5)})*11000$

$P = (\dfrac{-13.5}{-12.5})*11000$

P = 1.08 × 11000

P = $11880

Hence. the price you should charge for a midsized automobile if you expect to maintain your record sales is $11880

8 0

1 year ago

Masterson, Inc., has 4.1 million shares of common stock outstanding. The current share price is $84, and the book value per shar

Kitty [74]

Answer:

The answer is "8.37%".

Explanation:

$\text{MV of equity} = \text{equity price} \times \text{number of outstanding shares}$

$=84 \times 4100000\\\\=344400000$

$\text{MV of Bond1}=\text{Par value} \times \text{bonds outstanding} \times \text{age of percentage}$

$=1000 \times 70000 \times 0.98 \\\\=68600000$

$\text{MV of Bond2}=\text{Par value} \times \text{bonds outstanding} \times \text{age of percentage}$

$=1000 \times 50000 \times 1.08 \\\\=54000000$

$\text{MV of firm} = \text{MV of Equity} + \text{MV of Bond1}+ \text{MV of Bond 2}$

$=344400000+68600000+54000000\\\\=467000000$

$\text{Weight of equity W(E)} = \frac{\text{MV of Equity}}{\text{MV of firm}}$

$= \frac{344400000}{467000000}\\\\=0.7375$

$\text{Weight of debt W(D)}= \frac{\text{MV of Bond}}{\text{MV of firm}}$

$= \frac{122600000}{467000000}\\\\=0.2625$

Equity charges

By DDM.

$\text{Price = new dividend} \times \frac{(1 + \text{rate of growth})}{( \text{Equity expense-rate of growth)}}$

$84 = 3.95 \times \frac{(1+0.05)}{(\text{Cost of equity}- 0.05)}\\\\84 = 3.95 \times \frac{(1.05)}{(\text{Cost of equity} - 0.05)}\\\\84 = \frac{4.1475}{ (\text{Cost of equity} - 0.05)}\\\\\text{Cost of equity} -0.05 = \frac{4.1475}{84}\\\\\text{Cost of equity} -0.05 = 0.049375\\\\\text{Cost of equity} = 0.049375 + 0.05\\\\\text{Cost of equity} = 0.099375 \\\\\text{Cost of equity} \% = 9.9375 \% \ \ \ or \ \ \ 9.94 \% \\\\$

Debt expenses

Bond1

$K = N \times 2 \\\\$

$Bond \ Price = \sum [ \frac{\text{(Semi Annual Coupon)}}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{2})^k}] + \frac{Par\ value}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{2})^{N \times 2}}$

$k=1\\\\K =20 \times 2\\\\980 = \sum [ \frac {(5.1 \times \frac{1000}{200})}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{200})^k}] + \frac{1000}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{200})}^{20 \times 2}\\\\k=1\\\\\ YTM1 = 5.2628923903\\\\Bond2\\$

$K = N \times 2$

$Bond \ Price = \sum [ \frac{\text{(Semi Annual Coupon)}}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{2})^k}] + \frac{Par\ value}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{2})^{N \times 2}}$

$k=1\\\\K =12 \times 2\\\\$

$1080 =\sum [\frac{(5.6 \times \frac{1000}{200})}{(1 + \frac{YTM}{200})^k}] +\frac{1000}{(1 +\frac{YTM}{200})^{12 \times 2}} \\\\k=1\\\\YTM2 = 4.72\\\\$