Nadiya determines that there are no fractions equivalent to 2/10 with a denominator greater than 10, but less than 20, that have
a whole number numerator and denominator. Is Nadiya correct?
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the numerator and denominator by 2, the first fraction equivalent to 2/10 is 4/20.
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the whole fraction by any whole number, each equivalent fraction will continue to have a denominator of 10.
No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could multiply both the numerator and denominator of the unit fraction equivalent to 2/10 by 3 and arrive at the equivalent fraction 3/15.
No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could add any number between 1 and 8 to the numerator and denominator and arrive at an equivalent fraction with a denominator greater than 10 but less than 20.
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the numerator and denominator by 2, the first fraction equivalent to 2/10 is 4/20.
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the whole fraction by any whole number, each equivalent fraction will continue to have a denominator of 10.
No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could multiply both the numerator and denominator of the unit fraction equivalent to 2/10 by 3 and arrive at the equivalent fraction 3/15.
No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could add any number between 1 and 8 to the numerator and denominator and arrive at an equivalent fraction with a denominator greater than 10 but less than 20.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
We are looking for the probability :
Transform the law to standard normal like this:
The above formula is equivalent to this one:
From normal law table, we read the value of
.
Solving the above equation for the score n:
, it is the score we are looking for.
Transform the law to standard normal like this:
The above formula is equivalent to this one:
From normal law table, we read the value of
Solving the above equation for the score n: