If I read this properly than party one is republican
The best evaluation would be that the statement is invalid because we cannot be sure if the argument is referring to the same <span>provost. The whole paragraph is a fallacy. It was not directly stated that James Hoopster was the provost who saved the university from crisis. It just so happened that James Hoopster took the same path as to the provost who saved the university.</span>
The third alternative is the most correct (C).
When opening an account with a financial institution, it is important to read the agreement and policies of the institution to be aware of all fees charged to carry out financial operations and account maintenance.
<u>Some banks charge extra fees, often opportunistically, so it is important to thoroughly read the contract to avoid surprises and stress.</u>
