Answer:
Churchland
Explanation:
The neurophilosopher who explains how the hardwiring of the brain promotes bonding and empathy, primarily through the effects of oxytocin, which is the fundamental building block of all moral reasoning is "Patricia Churchland"
Churchland revealed that oxytocin is very important in bonding - in infant-to-mother bonding and mother-to-infant bonding. But in cases when it's level is lower, the degree of bonding will not be the same. She also really revealed that the subcortical structures are very important for the sites where morality can be found - like in the hypothalamus where oxytocin is released.
<span>Media networks often compete to be first. Insider information that results in the ability to present an article sooner than their competitors is a great incentive to cover topics of any niche. Accuracy is also key. If the insider information exposes accurate information, the media network is able to prepare their article without spending time checking facts.</span>
The answer is: A. Patterson's coercive family process.
Patterson's coercive family process highlight the relationship between Caregivers and the children, especially during caregiver's effort to enforce a certain behavior to the children.
In coercive family process, the caregiver tend to try to force the children to conform to the caregiver's demand by utilizing negative emotions (such as raising their voice and use threats).
When this happen, the children became much more likely to respond with the same negative attitude. This resulted in negative perception that both the caregivers and the children have toward one another;
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Research indicates that negative emotions generally create an unpleasant state within individuals. They <span> generally</span><span> contaminate rational decision-making and converging evidence. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
