I believe the answer is: single parenthood and abortion
Single parents would most likely create a massive hindrance in the teenage's future since their time would be divided between pursuing their economic needs and taking care of the kid. Abortion raises an ethical issues among people who see lives started as soon as the fetus is formed.
Answer:
The type of sampling used in Jankowski's study of gangs is Option D. Stratified sampling.
Explanation:
With stratified sampling, the researcher will partition the population into different groups, usually based on some characteristic that is common to that group. In this case, it was the different kinds of gang membership. Then, the researcher will take a sample of people within each specific group using another sampling method like simple random sampling for instance. The groups that are used in stratified sampling are called strata. Another example would be a national survey that is divided into strata of the different major ethnic groups that comprise the national population.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A.
<span>The terms “inborn behavior” and “instinct” have the same meaning as innate behavior.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
The hypothesis that will best demonstrate an economic benefit to the ranchers will be "Pastures with the highest diversity of plant species will have the highest net primary productivity."
Explanation:
This hypotheses would best demonstrate an economic benefit because it clearly states that when plant species are diverse, this will provide the highest net productivity to the ranchers. Hence if the aim of the student is to determine if increasing species diversity of edible plant would lead to great economic benefits, then this suits for the hypotheses.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
