Answer:
Becky, because her reason I'm step 2 does not justify her 2ndbstatement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Two angles which add up to give 180° are said to be defined as supplementary angles.
The Definition of Supplementary Angles is the most appropriate statement to justify the second statement in the proof, as written by Angie, compared to the Angle Addition Postulate stated by Becky.
The Angle Addition Postulate does not justify why the two of angles both equal 180°. According to the Angle Anldditiin Postulate, sum of 2 angles that share the same side can does not necessarily have to be 180°. It could be less than or greater than 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed her proof incorrectly.
The volume (when x = 10) would be 1,000 cubic units (10^3).
For this case we have the following equation:
Step 1 of the solution is to make the distributive property.
We have then:
Step 1 is correct.
The step is to combine similar terms. Caleb wrote:
He wrongly combined the similar terms on the right side of the equation.
The correct solution is:
Answer: In step 2, the like terms were not combined on the right side of the equation.
You have to answer all of the equations first
-4.8 • 3.2 = -15.36 (negative times a positive is negative)
2 1/4 + (-1 2/5) first find a common denominator, which would be 20
9/4= 45/20
-7/5 = -28/20
since adding a negative is the same as subtracting a positive, you would subtract 45 and 28 which is 17.
17/20 = 1 3/20 (the answer)
turn the fraction into a decimal by dividing the top number by the bottom number, so 17/20 = 0.85
4.92 divided by -3 equals -1.64 (the answer)
-2 3/5 - (-1 2/5)
make them into improper fractions which is -13/5 and -7/5
it stays negative, so the answer is -6/5 or -1.2
so the answer is
-4.8 • 3.2 < 4.2 divided by -3 < -2 3/5 - (-1 2/5) < 2 1/4 + (-1 2/5)
