Answer:
No, i disagree.
Explanation:
If the car is moving, it only has a velocity with a component in the horizontal direction. If we use galilean relativity, the velocity of the ball observed by my friend standing in the ground should only be affected in the horizonal direction, while the vertical stays the same for both observers.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
The moment of the resultant of these two forces with respect to O 376 lb-ft CCW which is <span>about moment center point O.</span>
Answer:
Diameter decreases by the diameter of 0.0312 m.
Explanation:
Given that,
Bulk modulus = 14.0 × 10¹⁰ N/m²
Diameter d = 2.20 m
Depth = 2.40 km
Pressure = ρ g h = 1030 × 9.81 × 2.4 × 1000
= 24.25 × 10⁶ N/m²
Volume = 
Bulk modulus is equal to
now
Δ r = -0.0156 m
change in diameter
Δ d = -2 × 0.0156
Δ d = -0.0312 m
Diameter decreases by the diameter of 0.0312 m.
Answer:
The frequency of the photon decreases upon scattering
Explanation:
Here we note that when a photon is scattered by a charged particle, it is referred to as Compton scattering.
Compton scattering results in a reduction of the energy of the photon and hence an increase in the wavelength (from λ to λ') of the photon known as Compton effect.
Therefore, since the wavelength increases, we have from
λf = λ'f' = c
f = c/λ
Where:
f and f' = The frequency of the motion of the photon before and after the scattering
c = Speed of light (constant)
We have that the frequency, f, is inversely proportional to the wavelength, λ as follows;
f = c/λ
As λ = increases, and c is constant, f decreases, therefore, the frequency of the photon decreases upon scattering.
An example for ruining a biodiversity is fishing.
The two factors that have
contributed to increased fishing in deep ocean waters in recent years are the
human population growth and decreased fishing opportunities inshore. Increase
population growth increases the demand for food which also leads to increase in
fish demand. Because the fish demand is high, inshore fishing opportunities
decrease that is why deep ocean waters is the new venue for fishing. This may sound absurd but poaching for subsistence is likely to be less damaging to he biodiversity <span>of an area than poaching for profit. Because the people do not care anymore to the biodiversity that they interrupted just to get back more profit. They do not care what must be taken from it like getting bigger fishes and leaving the smaller ones behind to maintain productivity.</span>
