-5 > -6
I think this is what it would be because -5 is greater than (>) -6
Hope this is right and it helps :)
Step-by-step explanation
<h3>
Prerequisites:</h3>
<u>You need to know: </u>



----------------------------------------------------------------



2 Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------



1 Solution
---------------------------------------------------------------



2 Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------



2 Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------



No Solutions
---------------------------------------------------------------
Answer:
Considering the prediction of people who will fill out the form and receive the refund, the company should expect its net profit to drop to:
- <u>$174.6 per computer tablet</u>.
Step-by-step explanation:
The benefit per tablet before the rebate program is $180 per computer tablet, however, once the rebate program is implemented, 18% of people who purchase their computer tablet are expected to complete the form and obtain the VISA card, which would reduce the benefit as shown below:
- 18% benefit from computer tablets = original benefit - refund value.
- 18% benefit from computer tablets = $180 - $30 = $150
With this we identify that 18% of computer tablets will have a benefit reduced to $150, however, as the remaining percentage of tablets (82%) will still have the benefit of $180, the general benefit must be calculated to have a single value, as it's shown in the following:
- Overall benefit = Percentage of tablets with reimbursement * Benefit of tablets with reimbursement + Percentage of tablets without reimbursement * Benefit of tablets without reimbursement.
- General profit = 18% * 150 + 82% * 180
- <u>General profit = $ 174.6
</u>
By having a $ 30 rebate on 18% of the tablets, the overall benefit drops to $174.6.
Answer:
Answer E
Step-by-step explanation
The statement gives a probability of approximately 0.022 for the difference in sample proportions, pˆA−pˆS, being greater than 0.
Answer:
d.There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the quality and price of a car are associated. There were ten cars used in the sample.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have two variables X₁: quality score of a car and X₂: the price of a car.
It was analyzed id there is an association between the quality and the price.
The null hypothesis of a Spearman's rank correlation test is:
H₀: There is no association between the quality and the price of cars.
The researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis which means that there is no association between the variables of interest.
The sample size is listed in the output n= 10 consumer reports.
I hope you have a SUPER day!