All categories

1 year ago

D=vit + at solve for vi

Mathematics

1 answer:

gavmur [86]1 year ago

7 0

Answer:

$\large\boxed{vi=\dfrac{d-at}{t}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$d=vit+at\qquad\text{subtract}\ at\ \text{from both sides}\\\\d-at=vit+at-at\\\\d-at=vit\qquad\text{divide obth sides by}\ t\\\\\dfrac{d-at}{t}=\dfrac{vit}{t}\\\\\dfrac{d-at}{t}=vi$

You might be interested in

A standard six-sided die is rolled $6$ times. You are told that among the rolls, there was one $1,$ two $2$'s, and three $3$'s.

Alex777 [14]

Answer:

$Sequence = 120$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

6 rolls of a die;

Required

Determine the possible sequence of rolls

From the question, we understand that there were three possible outcomes when the die was rolled;

The outcomes are either of the following faces: 1, 2 and 3

Total Number of rolls = 6

Possible number of outcomes = 3

The possible sequence of rolls is then calculated by dividing the factorial of the above parameters as follows;

$Sequence = \frac{6!}{3!}$

$Sequence = \frac{6 * 5 * 4* 3!}{3!}$

$Sequence = 6 * 5 * 4$

$Sequence = 120$

Hence, there are 120 possible sequence.

7 0

1 year ago

Which of the following are exterior angles , check all that apply?

brilliants [131]

Answer:

The answer is just <6

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

A principal of $2000 is placed in a savings account at 3% per annum compounded annually. How much is in the account after one ye

natita [175]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

After one year

A=p(1+r/n)^nt

=2000(1+0.03/12)^12*1

=2000(1+0.0025)^12

=2000(1.0025)^12

=2000(1.0304)

=$2060.8

After two-years

A=p(1+r/n)^nt

=2060.8(1+0.03/12)^12*2

=2060.8(1+0.0025)^24

=2060.8(1.0025)^24

=2060.8(1.0618)

=$2188.157

After three years

A=p(1+r/n)^nt

=2188.157(1+0.03/12)^12*3

=2188.157(1+0.0025)^36

=2188.157(1.0025)^36

=2188.157(1.0941)

=$2394.063

8 0

2 years ago

A cone-shaped container has a height of 6 feet and a diameter of 3 feet. It will be filled with concrete mix that costs $2.00 fo

Elza [17]

I think the answer is $113.1. The question was confusing so sorry if it’s wrong.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

It is known that driving can be difficult in regions where winter conditions involve snow-covered roads. For cars equipped with

noname [10]

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are

$H_0: \mu\ge 215\\\\H_1: \mu< 215$

Step-by-step explanation:

If we perform a hypothesis test, we can reject or not reject the null hypothesis.

To conclude that the tires have a decreased stopping distance (μ<215), we should state the null hypothesis $H_0: \mu\ge 215$ and then go on with the analysis to reject it (or not).

If the null hypothesis is rejected, the claim of the manufacturer is rigth.

The alternative hypothesis would be $H_1: \mu$ , that would turn rigth if the null hypothesis is rejected.

5 0

2 years ago