Answer:
Projects Y and Z
b. Projects W and Z
c. Projects W and Y
Explanation:
CAPM equation : Expected return = Risk free rate + Beta x (Expected market return - Risk free rate)
W = 4% + [0.85 x (11% - 4%)] = 9.95%
X = 4% + (0.92 x 7%) = 10.44%
Y = 4% + (1.09 x 7%) = 11.63%
Z = 4% + (1.35 x 7%) = 13.45%
Projects Y and Z have an expected return greater than 11%
b. Projects W and Z should be accepted because its expected return is higher than the IRR
c. Project W would be incorrectly rejected because the expected rate of return is less than the overall cost of capital (i.e. 9.95 is less than 11). But its expected rate of return is greater than the IRR
Y would be incorrectly accepted because its expected rate of return is greater than the overall cost of capital but its expected rate of return is less than the IRR
Responda:
Por favor, verifique a explicação
Explicação:
O método de dupla entrada simplesmente se refere a um princípio contábil em que cada transação realizada tem um registro duplo, ou seja, se uma operação de crédito é realizada, o débito correspondente é registrado, da mesma forma, quando ocorre um débito, o lançamento a crédito correspondente também é registrado ao lado.
No cenário acima, a entrada de débito do ativo adquirido pelo cliente à vista de R 3.400 enquanto a vale Lirios Ltda é creditada com o dinheiro recebido na venda de seu ativo.
Ativo Caixa R $ 3.400 - - - - Débito
vale Lirios Ltda (ativo) R $ 3.400 - - - crédito
<span>The best advice to be given to Ms. Lee in regards to the
scenario is that she has the eligibility for a SEP in which she could enrolled
in before she could even move to the location where she would likely be
residing to. With this plan, if she notified about moving earlier or in
advance, the period will only last for about two months in addition.</span>
Answer:
C. $4000
Explanation:
Given that
Total opportunity cost = salary plus interest forgone, that is 50,000 + 6% of 100,000
= 50,000 + 6000 = 56,000.
Total revenue received = 60,000
Recall that
Economic profits = Revenue - (implicit + explicit cost)
And that
Implicit cost = opportunity cost = 56,000
Explicit cost = 0 (from the question, revenue covered it)
Thus
Economic profit = 60000 - 56000
= $4000
The answer to the question above as to how much more will nick have to pay than miles if nick's loan has an APR of 13.10% and mile's loan has an APR of 7.75 the answer is letter B, $267.50. in calculation the total payment of nick for four years is $5655 that's with the added 13.10% compounded monthly and mile's is $5387.5 with 7.75% compounded monthly.