This must be FALSE, because:
7 players x 4(which is the range) = 28 which means that the total number of baskets made is 28.
If the greatest is 8, we must do 28 - 8, which gives us 20. This means that the remaining 6 players (7 - 1 = 6) made a total of 20 baskets.
However, if the fewest is 4 baskets, this means that the remaining 5 players (6 - 1 = 5) must have made a total of 16 baskets (20 - 4 = 16) and that each player must have scored 4 or more baskets each (since 4 was the fewest number of baskets made).
But this is impossible because if the remaining 5 players scored 4 (fewest number possible) each, it would give us 20 (4 x 5). But they should have made 16, or else the total of all the baskets would not be 28 (look back at start).
This means that the statement is impossible and therefore FALSE.
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
Option A
Step-by-step explanation:
A type I error is committed when a researcher rejects the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
The null hypothesis is: U <= 50%
The alternative is: U > 50%
Thus, the principal could have committed an error by rejecting null hypothesis and concluding that more than 50% of students want earlier lunch, when in actuality 50% or less want earlier lunch.
The moon does. The moon is waaaay bigger than any of these combined.
Answer:
Part A) 
Part B) She will spend more than 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
p-----> the number of hamburger patties
Part A) Luna has to buy at least 16 packages for an upcoming picnic


Part B) Suppose she actually needs more than 150 hamburgers. How much will she spend?
Let
c---------> the total cost
step 1
Divide 150 hamburgers by 8 (a package of hamburgers)
so

round to the nearest whole number
----> the minimum number of packages
step 2

