Answer: C. Making the initial determination that information requires protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interest of national security
Explanation: Derivative classification means the incorporating, paraphrasing, restating, or generating in new form information that is already classified, and marking the newly developed material consistent with the classification markings that apply to the source information. While working with classified information, individuals sometimes generate or create new documents and materials based upon that classified information. These individuals who reproduce, extract, or summarize
classified information, or who apply classification markings derived from
source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess
original classification authority. The newly created documents must be classified based upon the classification level of the information from which the new document was developed.
Answer:
b. virtue ethics utilitarianism.
Explanation:
According to my research the Hetch Hetchy reservoir would fall under the category of "virtue ethics utilitarianism" in this case. This is because Utilitarianism places the spotlight on the right and wrong aspects only based on the consequences of choosing a specific action or policy over other actions/policies. Since this seems to be the case when building the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir we can say that the answer is b. virtue ethics utilitarianism.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
give me a second to get the answers
Explanation:
Answer:
The guideline under this choice is that the first Amendment must ensure "unpopular opinion" offered that the larger part input is as of now secured. Regardless of whether Nazis intentionally picked a Jewish people group for their meeting, this was "serene" and the State reserved no option to forestall it. Besides, it makes a differentiation among activity and discourse, representative discourse, such as wearing Swastikas, is ensured as discourse and can't be prohibited or confined. The court concluded that it was desirable over permit this gathering to vent their scorn than to permit government to mention to residents what to think and state. This choice is significant, it made the way for emblematic discourse from numerous points of view, regardless of whether hostile for certain gatherings. Regardless of whether this is certain or negative relies upon out perspectives on freedom.
Faking it or over enthusiastic/ could be hormone levels
