Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation:
A.) the substitution effect would predict Ethan would consume less books and more movies and the income effect would predict he would consume less of both.
B.) the substitution and income effects would both predict Ethan would consume less of both goods.
C.) the substitution effect would predict Ethan would consume more books and less movies, and the income effect would predict he would consume less of both.
D.) the substitution and income effects would both predict Ethan would consume more of both goods.
If he continuos to buy 4 books ans 6 movies the total amount is $170, that he does not have. He has to buy less books or go less to the movies.
A global efect of a certain good (X) price rise can be divided into 2 efects:
- substitution effect: indicates a demand reduction of X, resulting from the price rise, making X less atractive to consumption
- income effect: indicates a reduction of the demanded quantity of X resulting from the reduction of the acquisition power created by the rise of X price.
So, answer is A.
Answer:
Give me more information
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
infinity
Step-by-step explanation:
a) the expected value of this gamble in dollars is Infinity
i.e
expected value = 
= 
b)
When offered, most people say they would pay only less than $10 to play this game.
What are two reasons why people are willing to pay so much less than the expected value?
These people are ready to pay less than $10 to play this game due to the fact that people usually overlook the unlikely event when making decisions. In a bid to that logic, they gamble in order to double their amount of money and the probability that heads may never come is ignored by these people and they may hope for a likely event i.e a head every time they play the game.
Also, the expected value is so humongous that if and only if that the first head appears after a long series of tails which is very less certain to occur, because mostly people would think that on an average the length of a series of tails ( or heads) is somewhat near 10 or so, but definitely infinity.
1) We have that there are (52,3) ways to pick 3 cards out of 52 cards. Also, there are (4,3) ways to pick 3 kings out of the 4 total available kings in the deck. In essence, we need to have one of those ways to be the selected 3 cards. Hence, the probability is the ration (4,3)/(52,3). Computing this:
P=

The probability is very low but not negligible.
2) The Pascal triangle defines a recursive relationship. Hence, we would need to calculate all the binomial coefficients up to 51. Thus, it is not at all practical to use the Pascal Triangle to calculate the ways. It is easier to do the direct computation.