Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: the higher the price the higher the quantity that the sellers are willing to supply.
Explanation:
To begin with, to understand why the supply curve slopes upwards we need to understand that <u>there is a direct relationship</u> between the quantity that the suppliers are willing to sell and tha price of the product offered and therefore that when the price increases the amount that the suppliers will be willing to offer will increase due to that direct relationship and that is reason why the supply curve slopes upwards.
Answer:
I took some work home because I had to meet an important deadline the next morning. If I am able to finish the work on time and do it correctly, then there is a chance of getting either a promotion or a pay raise. If I cannot complete it on time, I will not get fired, but any chances of a promotion or pay raise in the near will vanish.
Since I was working at home, I couldn't prepare anything for dinner, so I decided to buy food on a website and get it delivered home. I spent $20 on my dinner, even though I could have prepared a similar dinner for $5.
I was willing to pay for the expensive meal because the opportunity cost of preparing dinner instead was too high. I can afford to pay $15 more for eating, but I cannot afford to lose the opportunity of a promotion or a pay raise. Even if I do not get them immediately, not completing my job would have made it much harder to get it in the future.
My decision is rational because I was sacrificing a small amount of money in order to preserve something that is really valuable for me (promotion or pay raise).
All resources are scarce, and in this case, time was scarce. So I had to decide which action was more valuable and which action could yield a higher benefit.
The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
The sender i.e. Geroge who not even know the receiver that sells the homeopathy remedies online so this could raise a few issues but it is not to be considered very serious for red-flagged:
- Since e-commerce arises each and every time that lies between non-known parties online.
This is due to the dirt chape that could make it suspicious also they don't know each other so this should be considered red-flagged.
- The instructions with regard to the payment do not represent any signal of reliability and truthfulness so might me the receiver is trustworthy and genuine.
- In the case when the homeopathy remedies do not have the licensing and permissions so it would become questionable.
No one could suggest the specific brand of homeopathy as it becomes nonprofessional and non-appropriate, so the last option is not be considered.
Therefore we can conclude that The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
Learn more about homeopathy here: brainly.com/question/7460064
Answer:
Nearly an equal number of consumers use mobile and online banking to pay bills because of the ease and convenience these methods afford them.
Explanation:
To hypothesize means to provide a possible explanation for something. So, a possible reason or explanation of why most customers prefer the online and mobile methods of making payments and receiving funds is that it is much easier for them.
Some of these easy benefits include;
1. They do not have to stand in long queues to pay through cheques.
2. They can process their transactions from any location and at any time.
3. There are fewer requirements needed to process transactions.
