<u>Answer:
</u>
The conclusion does not follow the statement as it does not satisfy the conditions mentioned in the statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- From the description given of the moisture and temperature conditions of Malabo, it can be concluded that the weather in Malabo is humid.
- For the crop of rice to thrive, it is important that the weather is humid. But for the growth of celery, cotton, and rye, humid weather is not considered to be good. Hence, we can say that the weather in Malabo is favorable for the growth of rice only.
Answer:
The description about the setting is missing in the question.
The correct answer is ---
The party will be large and extravagant and will be held outdoors.
Explanation:
According to the party setting given in the description, the tent was like a huge pavilion. The tree in the field looks so small and is entirely covered with the tent. The entire tree was engulf by the tent and lanterns were hung at its branches. There was also an big open air kitchen set up inside the tent which is enormous. The entire setting was very expensive and it was held outdoors in the field.
The old world monkey that became s<span>pecial interest to paleoanthropologists because it lives in savannahs like those in which we expect ancestral humans may have lived is: </span><span>baboons
the </span>paleoanthropologists paid a lot of interest to this animal because their behavior and decision-making process is very close to human.
For example, in their baboons' group, there will be some type of leaders that lead through tyranny and some leaders that lead through cooperation and understanding. (just like humans)
On top of that, many of the baboon leaders that led with tyranny often betrayed by its subordinate and killed while sleeping (again, just like human)
The finding that a correlation exists between scores on all standardized intelligence tests and SCHOOL PERFORMANCE have been a problem in defining intelligence. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
The statistical syllogism is also called a non-deductive syllogism. This process argues in using the inductive reasoning for generalization. It is true for a particular case.
This procedure used the syllogism like most, frequently and never and rarely. It has its statistical generalizations it has one or two premises.
Premises is a generalization and argument that is used to conclude the generalization. Premises can be true and the conclusion can be wrong but it happened rarely.
Thus Zia has used here statistical syllogism for different subjects.
