Answer:
R. P. may be suffering a stroke or psychological problems. Your family should discuss the possibility of taking you to specialist doctors who can quickly diagnose his case and provide correct treatment.
Explanation:
As seen in the question above, R.P. is showing signs of drunkenness, even though he has not drunk any alcoholic beverage for years. This can indicate psychological problems, showing the need of the R.P. family to take him to a psychiatrist who can help him.
However, R.P. may be showing signs of stroke. These signs can be mistaken for drunkenness, because stroke causes the death of some brain cells, as it does not allow the region where these cells are to be irrigated with blood. In that case, the R.P. family should immediately call an emergency service that will help him as soon as possible.
Answer: Carla will be more affected by the beer than Carlos.
Explanation: Alcohol intoxication refers to high blood level of alcohol, toxic enough to injure or kill a person. It is negative behavior and physical effects due to the recent drinking of alcohol.
Generally, individuals with more weight compared with individuals with less weight will feel less intoxicated when consuming the same proportions of alcohol.
The correct answer is A. Integrity versus despair
Explanation:
"Integrity versus despair" is one of the stages in the theory of psychosocial development proposed by the German-American psychologist Erik Erikson. According to Erikson "Integrity versus despair" occurs in the last stage of human life (approximately from 70 years old to death) and during this individuals evaluate past experiences and depending on this evaluation they feel integrity in the case they accept positively experiences from the past or despair in case they regret experiences, this implies during this stage individuals can either feel satisfied or unsatisfied with their lives which also affects behavior and thoughts.
This concept can be applied to Jim, not only because according to age he is in the last stage of psychological development; but also, because Jim has evaluated his past experiences in the Korean War and at the end accept them positively which shows "integrity" according to Erikson and satisfaction. In the same way, this integrity leads Jim to speak about the war and even joined others who had similar experiences.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The statement radical Republicans worked for positive change in the best interest of all citizens can be refuted strongly as their work was not impartial and the discriminated against the African American citizens of the nation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The work of the radical Republicans was observed to be biased only towards the welfare of the white citizens, neglecting the development of African Americans.
- The bills that they passed during their regime were noticed to incline towards the good of the already privileged white citizens of the country.
- Their ignorance towards the popular outcries against the discrimination happening with the African Americans that they were not serious towards protecting the interests of African Americans.
Reconstruction opened the way to abolish slavery, with the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.
After the Civil War, covered by the protection of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution and the different Civil Rights Acts, African Americans were allowed -for a relatively short period- to vote, participate in the political process, and use public accommodations and some others, as manifestation of some of the constitutional gains.
Nonetheless, the <em>Radical Republicans</em> weren’t able to achieve their goal which was, to fully integrate the four million newly freed slaves into society virtually immediately, since The Supreme Court blocked those achievements by:
- Declaring the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional in 1883.
- Saying that the Congress lacked the constitutional authority under the 14th Amendment to grant equal protections under the law to blacks, stating that only states and local governments could do that.
- Passsing a ruling stating that the Enforcement Act of 1871, which forbade meetings of Ku Klux Klan members, was unconstitutional.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's rulings in these cases suppressed the civil rights movement in the latter half of the 19th century and affected the treatment of blacks in Southern states for decades.
