David made a class banner out of a large rectangular piece of paper. He cut a
1 answer:
Answer:
100 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of the banner is equal to the area of the initial rectangle minus the area of the cutout triangle.
The rectangle has a height of 8 inches and width of 14 inches, so its area is:
A = (8 in) (14 in) = 112 in²
The triangle has a base of 8 inches and a height of 3 inches, so its area is:
A = ½ (8 in) (3 in) = 12 in²
So the area of the banner is 112 in² − 12 in² = 100 in².
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the fraction
Consider its numerator and factor it:
You cann not take the cube root from you can only take the cube root from
, then the smallest whole number
such that
is a cube number is
When
Answer:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example always
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
represent the number of homeowners who would buy the security system
represent the number of renters who would buy the security system
sample 1
sample 2
represent the proportion of homeowners who would buy the security system
represent the proportion of renters who would buy the security system
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the value for the test (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the two proportions differs , the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:
(1)
Where
Calculate the statistic
Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:
Statistical decision
For this case we don't have a significance level provided , but we can calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a two sided test the p value would be:
So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example always
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.
Cost of chicken wings at Buffalo Bills = 8 wings for $7
Cost of 1 wing at Buffalo Bills =
Cost of chicken wings at Buffalo Mild Wings = 12 wings for $10
Cost of 1 wing at Buffalo Mild Wings =
Cost of chicken wings at Wingers = 20 wings at $17
Cost of 1 wing at Wingers =
Hence, comparing all the three costs per wing, we can see that Buffalo Mild Wings is serving chicken wings at lowest price of $0.833 per wing.