Answer:
From the graph attached, we know that 
by the corresponding angle theorem, this theorem is about all angles that derive form the intersection of one transversal line with a pair of parallels. Specifically, corresponding angles are those which are placed at the same side of the transversal, one interior to parallels, one exterior to parallels, like 
and 
.
We also know that, by definition of linear pair postulate, 
and are linear pair. Linear pair postulate is a math concept that defines two angles that are adjacent and for a straight angle, which is equal to 180°.
They are supplementary by the definition of supplementary angles. This definition states that angles which sum 180° are supplementary, and we found that and together are 180°, because they are on a straight angle. That is, 
If we substitute for , we have 
, which means that and are also supplementary by definition.
Whether dividing constant terms or polynomials, we always have definitive terms when it comes to division. Suppose we say, 10x divided by 2. The dividend is the 10x and the divisor is the 2. In other words, the dividend is the number to be divided by the divisor, to obtain the answer called the quotient.
When dividing polynomials, your main goal is to be able to divide the dividend evenly into the <em>divisor</em>. For example, we divide x²+2x+1 by x+1. The first thing you're going to focus is, what term will completely divide the first term of the polynomial? That would be x. Why? Because when you multiply x with x+1, the product is x²+x. When you subtract this from the polynomial, the x² will cancel out. All you have to do is subtract x from 2x, yielding x. Then, you carry down the last term of the equation: +1. You do the steps again. The term that will completely divide x+1 by x+1 is 1. When you subtract the two, you will come up with zero. That means there is no remainder. The polynomial is divisible by the divisor.
x + 1
------------------------------------
x+1| x²+2x+1
- x²+x
----------------------
x +1
- x +
------------
0
<span>6,289,002 rounded to the nearest 1,000,000 is 6,000,000. This is because the number in the hundred thousands column, the one to the right of the first digit, is less than five, so it gets rounded down.</span>
A. (−3, 3)
<span>3x – 4y = 21
</span>3(-3) - 4(3) = 21
-21 = 21 >>>>> not equal
B. (−1, −6)
<span>3(-1) - 4(-6) = 21
</span>21 = 21 >>>>>>>>>>Equal
C. (7, 0)
<span>3(7) - 4(0) = 21
</span>21 = 21>>>>>>>>>>equal
D. (11, 3)
<span>3(11) - 4(3) = 21
</span>21 = 21 >>>>>>>>>equal
