Let Ted be x.
Ed is 7 years older = x + 7
Ed = (3/4)Ted
(x + 7) = (3/4)x
x + 7 = 3x/4
x - 3x/4 = -7
x/4 = -7
x = -28, Ted = -28 years.
(x + 7) = -28 + 7 = -21, Ed = -21 years
Goodness. We had negative numbers for the ages, well does that make sense? No it doesn't.
Our answer is correct. But the sense in the question is lacking. The question has been wrongly set.
<span>We might assume negative ages to mean before they came into the world, before birth! </span>
Answer:
a graph that connects 3 points connected by a straight line that passes through (5, 0)
Step-by-step explanation:
A graph is the representation of numerical data by one or more lines that give visibility to the relationship between the data. Understanding graphics today is an essential task, as they are very present in our daily lives, whether in newspapers, magazines, the internet, etc.
If a teacher asks each student to take a piece of graph paper containing a graph, study the graph and tell which graph represents graphs of equivalent proportions. The student who has a graph that connects 3 points connected by a straight line passing through (5, 0) is the student who should speak.
First to solve this problem you are going to figure out how tall the tree is. So if Sharon is 54 inches and the tree 5 times the height she is you would do 54*5= 270. Next you go to find out how tall the floor of her tree house is. It says the floor is twice the height of her so you would do 54*2=108. Then the problem asks the difference between the top of the tree and the floor of the tree house. So 270-108=162. I hope this helped. :) Brainliest answer?
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
225 is not a perfect cube
Answer:
The principal, real, root of:
³√225=6.082202
All roots:
6.082202
−3.041101+5.26734144i
−3.041101−5.26734144i
225 is not a perfect cube