Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

7

In triangle ABC, AB measures 25 cm and AC measures 35 cm. The inequality < s < represents the possible third side length o

f the triangle, s, in centimeters. The inequality < p < represents the possible values for the perimeter, p, of the triangle, in centimeters.

2 answers:

yarga [219]2 years ago

9 0

Answer:

The inequality (10)< s < (60) represents the possible third side length of the triangle, s, in centimeters.

The inequality (70)< p < (120)represents the possible values for the perimeter, p, of the triangle, in centimeters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided information.

The sum of any 2 sides of a triangle must be greater than the measure of the third side.

Let say the third side 's' is the smallest side, then according to above condition.

$25+s>35\\s>35-25\\s>10$

Let say the third side 's' is the largest side, then according to above condition.

$25+35>s\\60>s$

Hence, the combined inequality is: $10$

Perimeter of a triangle is the sum of the length of all sides.

$p=25+35+s\\p=60+s$

If s>10 then the perimeter will be:

$p>60+10$

$p>70$

If 60 then the perimeter will be:

$p$

$p$

Therefore, the combined inequality is: $70$

Flura [38]2 years ago

4 0

we know that

The <u>Triangle Inequality Theorem</u> states that the sum of any 2 sides of a triangle must be greater than the measure of the third side

so

Let

s------> the length of the third side

$25+s > 35 \\ s > 35-25 \\ s> 10\ cm$

$25+35 > s \\ 60 > s \\ s< 60\ cm$

$10\ cm < s < 60\ cm$

therefore

<u>The answer part a) is</u>

$10\ cm < s < 60\ cm$

we know that

the perimeter of a triangle is the sum of the length sides

In this problem

$P=25+35+s\\P=60+s$

<u>For $s> 10\ cm$ </u>

the perimeter is equal to

$P > 60+10\\ P>70\ cm$

<u>For $s< 60\ cm$ </u>

the perimeter is equal to

$P < 60+60\\ P$

so

$70\ cm < P < 120\ cm$

therefore

<u>the answer part b) is</u>

$70\ cm < P < 120\ cm$

You might be interested in

Lyles height is twice the difference of the height of his brother, harry, and the height of his dad, vince. Lyle is 2 1/2 feet t

Greeley [361]

Answer:

$5 = 19 - 4v$

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

$\text{Lyle's height} = 2( \text{Harry's height - Vince's height})$

Let l be Lyle's height, h be Harry's height and v be Vince's height.

Thus, we can write:

$l = 2(h-v)$

Lyle's Height =

$2\dfrac{1}{2}\text{ feet}$

Harry's height =

$4\dfrac{3}{4}\text{ feet}$

Putting the value in the equation:

$2\dfrac{1}{2} = 2(4\dfrac{3}{4}- v)\\\\\dfrac{5}{2} = \dfrac{19}{2} - 2v\\\\5 = 19 - 4v\\4v = 19-5\\\\v = \dfrac{14}{4}\\\\v = 3\dfrac{2}{4} = 3\dfrac{1}{2}$

Thus, Vince's height is 3.5 feet.

7 0

2 years ago

Charmaine pays $848 for landscaping rocks for a project. The cost per pound is 32 cents. How many pounds did she purchase?

otez555 [7]

Okay so since it is 32 cents, it will be 0.32
You need to find the number of pounds
So, do 848/0.32
You get 2650
Charmaine purchased 2,650 pounds of rocks
hope this helps:)

6 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement follows from the given theorem? Theorem: The diagonal of a parallelogram divides it into two congruent triangles

777dan777 [17]

Answer with explanation:

Theorem : The diagonal of a parallelogram divides it into two congruent triangles.

Properties of parallelogram

1. Opposite sides are equal and parallel.

2. Diagonal bisect each other.

3. Opposite Angles are equal.

If you will look at the first three options

A: Diagonals of a parallelogram bisect opposite angles.→→False(Alternate angles are equal)

B: Consecutive sides of a parallelogram are congruent.→→→False(Opposite sides are congruent)

C: Consecutive angles of a parallelogram are congruent.→→→False(Opposite angles are congruent)

D: Consecutive angles of a parallelogram are supplementary.→→→→True

For,any parallelogram, having vertices , A, B and C and D

Opposite sides are parallel, so

1.∠A + ∠B=180°

2.∠C + ∠B=180°

3.∠C+ ∠D=180°

4. ∠A + ∠D=180°

Option D

6 0

2 years ago

Dimensional Analysis Method (also called conversion factor or unit analysis) (Appendix D: Dimensional Analysis, Page 397) o The

garik1379 [7]

Answer:

The dimensional analysis method uses equivalences written in <u>fractional</u> form. Because the numerator and denominator of the fraction are equivalent, the value of the fraction is <u>1.</u> Multiplying by 1 does not change the quantity, but using an equivalence will change the units (or label). In order for units to cancel they must be in <u>the numerator and the denominator</u> of the fraction

Step-by-step explanation:

Dimensional analysis is a method of problem solving that takes into consideration the identity property of multiplication whereby the product of a number and 1 will always give the same number, that is 1 × n = n whereby the value "n" remains the same after the multiplication

Therefore, a fraction of two equivalent measurements but different units has a value of 1, and multiplying the equivalent fraction with another measurement with the same unit as the denominator of the fraction with a value of 1 changes the unit to that of the unit of the numerator

4 0

1 year ago

What does it mean in context of the example that Alyssa’s rate of change is greater than Sarah’s?

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Part 1) The rate of change is the amount of money saved by week

Part 2) The amount of money saved weekly by Alyssa is greater than the amount of money saved weekly by Sarah.

Part 3) see the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

see the attached figure to better understand the problem

<u><em>The complete question is</em></u>

Part 1) What does the rate of change in the example represent?

Part 2) What does it mean in context of the example that Alyssa’s rate of change is greater than Sarah’s?

Part 3) Write ordered pairs for the initial values of each function. Tell what the initial values represent

Part 1) we know that

The rate of change is the slope or unit rate of the linear equation

The formula of slope is "rise over run", where the "rise" (means change in y, up or down) and the "run" (means change in x, left or right)

In this context the rate of change is the amount of money saved by week

Part 2) we know that

Alyssa’s rate of change is equal to $8 per week

Sarah’s rate of change is equal to $6 per week

That means ----> The amount of money saved weekly by Alyssa is greater than the amount of money saved weekly by Sarah.

Part 3) we know that

The initial value or y-intercept is the value of y when the value of x is equal to zero

In this context , the initial value is the amount of money available at the time of beginning to save

so

<em>Sarah's Savings</em>

Looking at the graph

The initial value is the point (0,8)

That means ----> At the beginning (x=0), Sarah already had $8 saved.

<em>Alyssa's Savings</em>

Looking at the graph

The initial value is the point (0,0)

That means ----> At the begin (x=0), Alyssa had nothing saved.

8 0

2 years ago