Answer:
The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is
No. As the 95% CI include both negative and positive values, no proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference between them.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to construct a confidence interval for the difference of proportions.
The difference in the sample proportions is:
The estimated standard error is:
The z-value for a 95% confidence interval is z=1.96.
Then, the lower and upper bounds are:
The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is
<em>Can it be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group?</em>
No. It can not be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group, as the confidence interval include both positive and negative values.
This means that we are not confident that the actual difference of proportions is positive or negative. No proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference.
Answer:
x+10-y
Step-by-step explanation:
i'm not 100% sure about this response, but i'd assume the answer is like this for the following reasons:
alex is x years old, and 10 years have passed, meaning 10 years are added onto his age (x+10). addison is still the same amount of years apart from him in age, so you subtract y from that (x+10-y).
Answer:
£699 in London
£902.87 in Paris
£1505.63 in New York
The lowest price of the iPhone is £699 in London.
Answer:
We reject H₀. We support that the new average credit card debt is bigger than the previous average
Step-by-step explanation:
Five years earlier
μ = 8189
σ = 690
Sample size n = 32
Recent year debt
x = 8776
Sample size n = 32
a) Hypothesis Test:
Null Hypothesis H₀ x = μ = 8189
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ x > μ
b) z(c) Alternative Hypothesis establishes that the test is a one tail-test to the right.
z(c) for significance level α = 0.05 is from z-table z(c) = 1,64
c) z(s) = ( x - μ ) / σ /√n
z(s) = ( 8776 - 8189 ) / 690 /√32
z(s) = 587 *5,66/ 690
z(s) = 4,81
d) Comparing z(c) and z(s)
z(s) > z(c) Then z(c) is in the rejection region and we reject H₀
e) We have evidence that at 95 % of confidence the new value for the debt in credit card is now bigger than the average
Answer:
5. B
6. C
7. D
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this is correct and helps hehe
