Ask question

Ask question

All categories

lorasvet [3.4K]

2 years ago

10

Follow these steps to solve this problem: Two identical loudspeakers, speaker 1 and speaker 2, are 2.0 m apart and are emitting

1700-Hz sound waves into a room where the speed of sound is 340 m/s. Consider a point 4.0 m in front of speaker 1, which lies along a line from speaker 1, that is perpendicular to a line between the two speakers. Is this a point of maximum constructive interference, a point of perfect destructive interference, or something in between?

1 answer:

erastova [34]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

It is somewhere in between

Explanation:

Wave length of sound from each of the speakers = 340 / 1700 = 0.2 m = 20 cm

Distance between first speaker and the given point = 4 m.

Distance between second speaker and the given sound

D = √(4² + 2²)

D = √(16 + 4)

D = √20

D = 4.472 m

Path difference = 4.472 - 4 =

0.4722 m.

Path difference / wave length = 0.4772 / 0.2 = 2.386

This is a fractional integer which is neither an odd nor an even multiple of half wavelength. Hence this point is of neither a perfect constructive nor a perfect destructive interference.

You might be interested in

The magnitude J(r) of the current density in a certain cylindrical wire is given as a function of radial distance from the cente

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

$I=68.31\times 10^{-6}\ A$

Explanation:

Given that

J(r) = Br

We know that area of small element

dA = 2 π dr

I = J A

dI = J dA

Now by putting the values

dI = B r . 2 π dr

dI= 2π Br² dr

Now by integrating above equation

$\int_{0}^{I}dI= \int_{r_1}^{r_2}2\pi Br^2 dr$

$I={2\pi B}\times \dfrac{r_2^3-r_1^3}{3}$

Given that

B= 2.35 x 10⁵ A/m³

r₁ = 2 mm

r₂ = 2+ 0.0115 mm

r₂ = 2.0115 mm

$I={2\pi B}\times \dfrac{r_2^3-r_1^3}{3}$

By putting the values

$I={2\pi \times 2.35 \times 10^5 }\times \dfrac{(2.0115\times 10^{-3})^3-(2\times 10^{-3})^3}{3}\ A$

$I=68.31\times 10^{-6}\ A$

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The burning of fossil fuels contributes to the addition of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. These gases trap thermal energy i

denpristay [2]

Answer:

B. there would be a global rise in temperatures

Hence, global warming

Explanation:

hope this helped! :D

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Case 1: A DJ starts up her phonograph player. The turntable accelerates uniformly from rest, and takes t₁ = 11.9 seconds to get

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Part a)

$\omega = 8.17 rad/s$

Part b)

$N = 7.74 rev$

Part c)

$\alpha = 0.69 rad/s^2$

Part d)

$\alpha = 0.48 rad/s^2$

Part e)

$t = 9.14 s$

Explanation:

Part a)

Angular speed is given as

$\omega = 2\pi f$

$\omega = 2\pi(\frac{78}{60})$

$\omega = 8.17 rad/s$

Part b)

Since turn table is accelerating uniformly

so we will have

$\theta = \frac{\omega_f + \omega_i}{2} t$

$\theta = \frac{8.17 + 0}{2}(11.9)$

$2N\pi = 48.6$

$N = 7.74 rev$

Part c)

angular acceleration is given as

$\alpha = \frac{\omega_f - \omega_i}{t}$

$\alpha = \frac{8.17 - 0}{11.9}$

$\alpha = 0.69 rad/s^2$

Part d)

When its angular speed changes to 120 rpm

then we will have

$\omega_2 = 2\pi (\frac{120}{60})$

$\omega_2 = 12.56 rad/s$

number of turns revolved is 15 times

so we have

$\omega_f^2 - \omega_i^2 = 2 \alpha \theta$

$12.56^2 - 8.17^2 = 2\alpha (2\pi\times 15)$

$\alpha = 0.48 rad/s^2$

Part e)

now for uniform acceleration we have

$\omega_f - \omega_i = \alpha t$

$12.56 - 8.17 = 0.48 t$

$t = 9.14 s$

7 0

2 years ago

9ma electric current is flowing through a conducting wire , then the number of electron passing through it in 3 min is

Leviafan [203]

Answer:

1.0125 x 10^19

Explanation:

current flowing through conductive wire= 9mA = 9 x 10^ -3 A

charge passing per 3 min

Q = It

= 9 x 10^ -3 x (3 x 60)

= 1.620 C

no of electrons in charge

Q = ne

1.620 = n x 1.6 x 10 ^ -19

n. = 1.0125 x 10 ^19

4 0

2 years ago

Imagine that you replace the block in the video with a happy or sad ball identical to the one used as a pendulum, so that the sa

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer: a) The Answer to the question is option a) None of it.

Explanation:

The reason is because according to the law of conservation of energy Energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can be transformed from one form to the other. Therefore none of the kinetic energy was dissipated, rather it was transformed to another form of energy.

6 0

2 years ago