All categories

2 years ago

Kate had 70 brooms; Alisa had 20 more brooms than Kate. What was the ratio of Kate’s brooms to Alisa’s brooms?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Shalnov [3]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

7:9

Step-by-step explanation:

it was 70:70+90 cuz it was 20 moe than kates broom and if u simpifly that it will be 7:9 and sorry if my grammers bad im also a student lol i hope this helps. :)

You might be interested in

Mr. and Mrs. Smith's children all play different sports. They want to buy a combination of soccer training sets,which each cost

8090 [49]

C is the answer because a number of children are unknown.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The diameter of Circle Q terminates on the circumference of the circle at (0,3) and (0,-4). Write the equation of the circle in

Gnesinka [82]

First, determine the center of the circle by getting the midpoint of the points given for the circumference.
midpoint = ((0 + 0)/2, (3 + -4)/2)
midpoint (0, -0.5)
Then, we get the radius by determining the distance from either of the circumferential point to the center.
radius = √(0 - 0)² + (3 +4)² = 7
The equation for the circle would be,
x² + (y + 0.5)² = 7²

8 0

2 years ago

Consider two people where one person is 20% taller than the other but proportioned in exactly the same way. (That is, the tall

Masja [62]

Answer:

43.2in

Step-by-step explanation:

If the two people are equally proportional, then knowing the size of the waist of one of them, we gonna we be able to know the other's wais size, by the relation.

36in*(1*20%) = 36in*1.2 = 43.2in

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The heat evolved in calories per gram of a cement mixture is approximately normally distributed. The mean is thought to be 100,

Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

A.the type 1 error probability is $\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

B. β = 0.0122

C. β = 0.0000

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mean = 100

standard deviation = 2

sample size = 9

The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

$\mathtt{H_o: \mu = 100}$

$\mathtt{H_1: \mu \neq 100}$

A. If the acceptance region is defined as $98.5 < \overline x > 101.5$ , find the type I error probability $\alpha$ .

Assuming the critical region lies within $\overline x < 98.5$ or $\overline x > 101.5$ , for a type 1 error to take place, then the sample average x will be within the critical region when the true mean heat evolved is $\mu = 100$

∴

$\mathtt{\alpha = P( type \ 1 \ error ) = P( reject \ H_o)}$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P( \overline x < 98.5 ) + P( \overline x > 101.5 )}$

when $\mu = 100$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P \begin {pmatrix} \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} < \dfrac{\overline 98.5 - 100}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \end {pmatrix} + \begin {pmatrix}P(\dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} > \dfrac{101.5 - 100}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \end {pmatrix} }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z < \dfrac{-1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} ) + P(Z > \dfrac{1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z 2.25) }$

$\mathtt{\alpha = P ( Z$

From the standard normal distribution tables

$\mathtt{\alpha = 0.0122+( 1- 0.9878) })$

$\mathtt{\alpha = 0.0122+( 0.0122) })$

$\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

Thus, the type 1 error probability is $\mathbf{\alpha = 0.0244 }$

B. Find beta for the case where the true mean heat evolved is 103.

The probability of type II error is represented by β. Type II error implies that we fail to reject null hypothesis $\mathtt{H_o}$

Thus;

β = P( type II error) - P( fail to reject $\mathtt{H_o}$ )

∴

$\mathtt{\beta = P(98.5 \leq \overline x \leq 101.5) }$

Given that $\mu = 103$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{98.5 -103}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \leq \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{n}} \leq \dfrac{101.5-103}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{-4.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} \leq Z \leq \dfrac{-1.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(-6.75 \leq Z \leq -2.25) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(z< -2.25) - P(z < -6.75 )}$

From standard normal distribution table

β = 0.0122 - 0.0000

β = 0.0122

C. Find beta for the case where the true mean heat evolved is 105. This value of beta is smaller than the one found in part (b) above. Why?

$\mathtt{\beta = P(98.5 \leq \overline x \leq 101.5) }$

Given that $\mu = 105$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{98.5 -105}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}} \leq \dfrac{\overline X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{n}} \leq \dfrac{101.5-105}{\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{9}}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P( \dfrac{-6.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}} \leq Z \leq \dfrac{-3.5}{\dfrac{2}{3}}) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(-9.75 \leq Z \leq -5.25) }$

$\mathtt{\beta = P(z< -5.25) - P(z < -9.75 )}$

From standard normal distribution table

β = 0.0000 - 0.0000

β = 0.0000

The reason why the value of beta is smaller here is that since the difference between the value for the true mean and the hypothesized value increases, the probability of type II error decreases.

8 0

2 years ago

Write the fraction or mixed number as a percent. 43/25 = %

Stels [109]

This is a fraction, so treat it like one. Divide 43 and 25 and you'll get 1.72. Multiply that decimal value by 100 and that is your percent, 172%

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers