answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
velikii [3]
1 year ago
12

Which number line models the expression 1/8-(-3/4)

Mathematics
1 answer:
RideAnS [48]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

\frac{7}{8}

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: \frac{1}{8}-(\frac{-3}{4} )

To find: number which represents the expression

Solution:

Integers refers to natural numbers, 0 together with negative of rational numbers.

A rational number is the number of the form \frac{p}{q} where p and q are integers and q\neq 0 .

\frac{1}{8}-(\frac{-3}{4} )=\frac{1}{8}+\frac{3}{4}\\ =\frac{1+6}{8}\\ =\frac{7}{8}

So, \frac{7}{8} represents \frac{1}{8}-(\frac{-3}{4} )

You might be interested in
Is 9.373 a repeating decimal? Is it rational? Explain your reasoning.
Galina-37 [17]

its is not a repeating decimal and it is a rational number because a rational number is a number that does not have repeating decimal but a irrational number does have repeating decimal

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare partial products and regrouping how the methods are alike and different
shtirl [24]
<span>Partial products are different in regrouping in terms of how numbers are clustered from a set equation as a whole delivering it individual but naturally to all the numbers involved in the set. </span>
Regrouping is just like the commutative or associative property of numbers.
<span>Associative property of addition is used when you want to group addends. This is mainly used to cluster set of numbers or in this case, addends. How do you use the associative property when you break apart addends? Simple you group them using the open and closed parentheses or brackets. Take for an example 1 + 1 + 2 = 4. Using the associative property you can have either (1 + 1) + 2 = 4 or 1 + (1 + 2) = 4 clustered into place.  
</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to a Pew Research survey, about 27% of American adults are pessimistic about the future of marriage and the family. Th
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

P(X≤5)=0.5357

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the binomial model, the probability that x adults from the sample, are pessimistic about the future is calculated as:

P(x)=\frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!} *p^{x}*(1-p)^{n-x}

Where n is the size of the sample and p is the probability that an adult is pessimistic about the future of marriage and family. So, replacing n by 20 and p by 0.27, we get:

P(x)=\frac{20!}{x!(20-x)!}*0.27^{x}*(1-0.27)^{20-x}

Now, 25% of 20 people is equal to 5 people, so the probability that, in a sample of 20 American adults, 25% or fewer of the people are pessimistic about the future of marriage and family is equal to calculated the probability that in the sample of 20 adults, 5 people of fewer are pessimistic about the future of marriage and family.

Then, that probability is calculated as:

P(X≤5)= P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(5)

Where:

P(0)=\frac{20!}{0!(20-0)!}*0.27^{0}*(1-0.27)^{20-0}=0.0018

P(1)=\frac{20!}{1!(20-1)!}*0.27^{1}*(1-0.27)^{20-1}=0.0137

P(2)=\frac{20!}{2!(20-2)!}*0.27^{2}*(1-0.27)^{20-2}=0.0480\\P(3)=\frac{20!}{3!(20-3)!}*0.27^{3}*(1-0.27)^{20-3}=0.1065\\P(4)=\frac{20!}{4!(20-4)!}*0.27^{4}*(1-0.27)^{20-4}=0.1675\\P(5)=\frac{20!}{5!(20-5)!}*0.27^{5}*(1-0.27)^{20-5}=0.1982

Finally, P(X≤5) is equal to:

P(X≤5) = 0.0018+0.0137 + 0.0480 + 0.1065 + 0.1675 + 0.1982

P(X≤5) = 0.5357

3 0
1 year ago
How do I solve 3/10+2.125 <br> Converted into fractions
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

97/40

Step-by-step explanation:

so 2.125= 17/8

3/10+17/8 need to find common denominator so

times 8/8 to 3/10

times 10/10 to 17/8

24/80+170/80= 194/80 (common denominator so can add)

divide 194/80 because want reduce form

97/40 is the answer

(When i look at it now i can just time 4/4 and 5/5 but its ok this still gets the answer)

3 0
2 years ago
Which compound inequality is equivalent to the absolute value inequality ? –6 &gt; b and b &gt; 6 b &gt; –6 or b &lt; 6 –6 &lt;
guajiro [1.7K]
Just 6 because negative 6 is in between the positive 6
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Simplify 6√1,000m^3n^12
    11·2 answers
  • A culture of 1.75×1018 bacteria is in petri dish A. A culture of 6.25×1015 bacteria is in petri dish B. How many times greater i
    12·1 answer
  • A 16-ounce bottle of Spring Water is $1.76. A 20-ounce bottle of Fresh Water is $2.40. Which statement about the unit price is t
    7·1 answer
  • Which equations are equivalent to + StartFraction 13 Over 15 EndFraction StartAbsoluteValue 2 minus x EndAbsoluteValue equals St
    14·1 answer
  • . For each of these intervals, list all its elements or explain why it is empty. a) [a, a] b) [a, a) c) (a, a] d) (a, a) e) (a,
    5·1 answer
  • Brody is purchasing some tools for his workshop. He has a budget of $120 and needs to buy at least 14 tools. Each hammer costs $
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THANK YOUUUU Your group has $120 available for the banquet. Any other costs must be covered from selling tickets for
    12·1 answer
  • Ali said the turkey patties she prepared for her friends had 73.5 grams of fat. The chart shows the nutritional facts for turkey
    6·1 answer
  • an inspector tested the first 125 radios that came off the production line today and found only 60% acceptable. After the inspec
    7·1 answer
  • Jean works for the government and was conducting a survey to determine the income levels of a number of different neighborhoods
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!