These are known as supply chain planning systems, because they help organize and make sense of the various steps in the supply chain.
Answer:
(C) -26%
Explanation:
Initial quantity of pizzas demanded = 10,000 slices
New quantity of pizzas demanded = 7,400 slices
Change in quantity of pizzas demanded = new quantity demanded - initial quantity demanded = 7,400 - 10,000 = -2,600 slices
Percentage change in quantity demanded = (change in quantity of pizzas demanded ÷ initial quantity of pizzas demanded) × 100 = (-2600 ÷ 10,000) × 100 = -0.26 × 100 = -26%
Answer:
A. Take $1 million now.
Explanation:
A. If we take $1 million now the present value of the money is $1 million.
B. If we choose to take $1.2 million paid out over 3 years then present value will at 10% will be;
$300,000 + $300,000 / 1.2 + $300,000/ 1.44 + $300,000 / 1.728
$300,000 + $250,000 + $208,000+ $173,611 = $931,944
The present value of option B is less than present value of option A. We should select option A and take $1 million now.
Answer:
3. one case of 24 sodas @ $ 18.50
Explanation:
The question requires that the hosts need to have enough to have two sodas each. The number of guests being 10, the requirement is to have 20 sodas.
Now comparing the various pack sizes available:
1. 20 sodas $ 1.50 per bottle, Total cost $ 30, per serving cost $1.50
2. 4 6 packs @ $ 5 each. Total cost $20, Per serving cost $0.83
3. 24 soda case @ $18.5. Total cost $ 18.50, Per Serving costs $ 0.77
4, 2 x 24 soda cases @ 18.50. Total Cost $ 37.00 Per serving costs $ 0.77
The per serving costs are the same in 3 & 4 above, however, since the requirement is to have 20 sodas and the overall costs as well as the per serving costs is the best in option 3, this is the preferred option.
Answer:
C. Tenancy in common.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Scotty and Kirk must title the boat as a tenancy in common. This refers to ownership contract in which each party has a separate transferable interest in the ownership of the asset in question. Which in this case would be the boat that they would like to purchase together. By doing so they would be able to transfer each of their ownership to whomever they would like in the future, without the approval of the other.