Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

7

Explain how the boss at the company in the following scenario could have delegated the tasks more appropriately : Samuel and Mar

tha work at the same agricultural consultation company . Samuel works in agricultural quality control, while Martha is an agricultural logistics specialist . A new boss delegated Martha to negotiate a financial deal with a farm and then create a strategy for the farm.

1 answer:

OverLord2011 [107]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Should have had Martha negotiate the logistics of the financial deal then have Samuel come up with the strategy plan

Explanation:

Samuel is quality control so he would know how to come up with a plan to best fit customer and company need assuring that both parties get the most out of the exchange and or business agreement

You might be interested in

Jody is an agent for Insta Cross Country Trucking Inc. In the course of Jody's performance for the firm, Jody pays Heck for cert

Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

Reimbursement.

Explanation:

When an agent incurs expenses while acting in the interest of principal them the principal is obligated to reimburse the agent the funds spent.

In this scenario Jody is an agent for Insta Cross Country Trucking Inc. In the course of Jody's performance for the firm, Jody pays Heck for certain vehicle maintenance and repair services. Jody has the right to request for refund based on principal's duty of reimbursement.

The action taken must be verified to be in the interest of the principal if not she will not be entitled to reimbursement.

5 0

2 years ago

A bond has a face value of $1,000, a coupon of 4% paid annually, a maturity of 30 years, and a yield to maturity of 7%. What rat

Lelechka [254]

Answer:

-11.8%

Explanation:

the key to answer this question is to remember that valuation of a bond depends basically of calculating the present value of a series of cash flows, so let´s think about a bond as if you were a lender so you will get interest by the money you lend (coupon) and at the end of n years you will get back the money you lend at the beginnin (principal), so applying math we have the bond value given by:

$price=\frac{principal*coupon}{(1+i)^{1} }+ \frac{principal*coupon}{(1+i)^{2} } \frac{principal*coupon}{(1+i)^{3} }+...+\frac{principal+principal*coupon}{(1+i)^{n} }$

so in this particular case that one year later there are 29 years to maturity so we have:

$price=\frac{1,000*0.04}{(1+0.08)^{1} }+ \frac{1,000*0.04}{(1+0.08)^{2} } \frac{1000*0.04}{(1+0.08)^{3} }+...+\frac{1,000+1,000*0.04}{(1+0.08)^{30} }$

$price=553.6638$

so as we have a higher rate the investment has the next return:

$return=\frac{553.66}{627.73} -1$

$return=-11.8\%$

4 0

1 year ago

Ricardo pays the following taxes during the year: Ricardo's Taxes Taxes Amounts Real estate taxes on his personal residence $2,5

exis [7]

The answer is 5,000bdbrbgvtvdhdudidjrbrbfbtbfjf

7 0

2 years ago

Build a schedule for the following staffing requirements, giving workers two consecutive days off per cycle (not including Sunda

jasenka [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The following process is used to schedule staffing requirements.

Start appointing workers in a way that two days contain the lowest amount of staff required are designated first.

Then, we minus 1 from each cell except for the selected pair of days.

After that, we lookout for pairs of days that contain the least amount of staff requirements.

We will then repeat the above process until the staffing requirements are fully met.

OUTPUT:

$\ A\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ B\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ D\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ E\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ G$

$1 \ \ \ \ Day \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Mon \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Tue \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Wed \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Thur \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Fri \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Sat$

$2 \ \ \ \ Staff \ needed \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5$

$3 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf{2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5$

$4 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf{ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4$

$5 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf{1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3$

$6 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf{1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2$

$7 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf{0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1}$

$8 \ \ \ \ Worker \ 6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1$

$9 \ \ \ \ No \ working^* \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5$

10 *count the number of workers after excluding highlighted cells and 0 values.

Day Minimum number of workers needed

$Mon \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3$

$Tue \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4$

$Wed \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2$

$Thur \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3$

$Fri \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4$

$Sat \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5$

6 0

2 years ago

Leo Consulting enters into a contract with Highgate University to restructure Highgate’s processes for purchasing goods from sup

fomenos

Answer:

The transaction price would Leo estimated for this contract is $30,000

Explanation:

The computation of the transaction price is shown below:

= (Fixed fee + additional amount) × chance + fixed fee × chance

= $35,000 × 50% + $25,000 × 50%

= $17,500 + $12,500

= $30,000

hence, the transaction price would Leo estimated for this contract is $30,000

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct answer could come

6 0

1 year ago