answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha2012 [34]
1 year ago
13

A liquid dietary product implies in its advertising that use of the product for one month results in an average weight loss of a

t least three pounds. Eight subjects use the product for one month, and the resulting weight loss data are reported as follows.
Subject Initial Weight (lbs) Final Weight(lbs)
1 165 161
2 201 195
3 195 192
4 198 193
5 155 150
6 143 141
7 150 146
8 187 183
a) Do the data support the claim of the producer of the dietary product with the probability of Type 1 error of .05?
b) Do the data support the claim of the producer of the dietary product with the probability of Type 1 error of .01?
c) In an effort to improve sales, the producer is considering changing its claim from "at least three pounds" to "at least five pounds". Repeat parts a and b to test this new claim.
Mathematics
1 answer:
BigorU [14]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

Following are the responses to the given question:

Step-by-step explanation:

Please find the table in the attached file.

mean and standard deviation difference: \bar{d}=\frac{\Sigma d}{n} =\frac{-4-6-.......-4-4}{8}=-4.125 \\\\S_d=\sqrt{\frac{\Sigma (d-\bar{d})^2 }{n-1}}=\sqrt{\frac{(-4 + 4.125)^2 +.......+(-4 +4.125)^2 }{8-1}}= 1.246

For point a:

hypotheses are:

H_0 : \mu_d \geq -3\\\\H_a : \mu_d < -3\\\\

degree of freedom:

df=n-1=8-1=7

 From t table, at\alpha = 0.05, reject null hypothesis if t.

test statistic:  

t=\frac{\bar{d}-\mu_d }{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{d}}}=\frac{ -4.125- (-3)}{\frac{1.246}{ \sqrt{8}}} =-2.55

because the t=-2.553, removing the null assumption. Data promotes a food product manufacturer's assertion with a likelihood of Type 1 error of 0.05.

For point b:

From t table, at \alpha =0.01, removing the null hypothesis if t.

because t=-2.553 >-2.908, fail to removing the null hypothesis.  

The data do not help the foodstuff producer's point with the likelihood of a .01-type mistake.

For point c:

Hypotheses are:

H_0: \mu_d \geq -5\\\\H_a: \mu_d < -5

Degree of freedom:

df=n-1=8-1=7

From t table, at \alpha =0.05, removing the null hypothesis if t.

test statistic:  t=\frac{\bar{d}-\mu_d}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}} =\frac{-4.125-(-5)}{\frac{1.246}{\sqrt{8}}}=1.986

Since t-1.986 >-1.895, The null hypothesis fails to reject. The results do not support the packaged food producer's claim with a Type 1 error probability of 0,05.

From t table, at\alpha= 0.01, reject null hypothesis ift.

Since t=1.986>-2.998 , fail to reject null hypothesis.  

Data do not support the claim of the producer of the dietary product with the probability of Type 1 error of .01.

You might be interested in
N(17+x)=34x−r<br> I need to solve for x
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

The value of x is, x= \frac{17N+r}{34-N}

Explanation:

Given: N(17+x)=34x-r

Distributive Property states that when a number is multiplied by the sum of two numbers, the first number can be distributed to both of those numbers and multiplied by each of them separately.

If a\cdot(b+c) =a\cdot b + a\cdot c

Now, using distributive property on left hand side of the given expression as:

N\cdot 17+N\cdot x = 34x-r or 17N+Nx = 34x-r

Addition Property of equality state that we add the same number from both sides of an equation.

Add r to both sides of an equation:

17N+Nx+r=34x-r+r

Simplify:

17N+Nx+r=34x

Subtraction Property of equality state that we subtract the same number from both sides of an equation.

Subtract Nx from both sides of an equation;

17N+Nx+r-Nx=34x-Nx

Simplify:

17N+r=34x-Nx

or

17N+r=x(34-N)

Division Property of equality states that we divide the same number from both sides of an equation.

Divide by (34-N) to both sides of an equation;

\frac{17N+r}{34-N}= \frac{x(34-N)}{34-N}

On Simplify:

x= \frac{17N+r}{34-N}





4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Round to the nearest ten thousand 905154
kolbaska11 [484]
You want to round 905,154 to the nearest ten-thousands place. The ten-thousands place in your number is shown by the bold underlined digit here:

9<em><u>0</u></em>5,154

    To round 905,154 to the nearest ten-thousands place...

    The digit in the ten-thousands place in your number is the 0. To begin the rounding, look at the digit one place to the right of the 0, or the 5, which is in the thousands place.

    Since the 5 is greater than or equal to 5, we'll round our number up by

        Adding 1 to the 0 in the ten-thousands place, making it a 1.

    and by changing all digits to the right of this new 1 into zeros.

The result is: 910,000.

So, 905,154 rounded to the ten-thousands place is 910,000.

5 0
2 years ago
How many possible outcomes, including both main effects and interaction effects, are possible for a factorial design with three
KIM [24]
Your answer will be <span>8</span>
7 0
2 years ago
In a meeting, there are five presenters: Lily, Catherine, Ted, Edward, and Bianca. Bianca must present after Edward but not imme
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

Lily would present after Edward

Step-by-step explanation:

Catherine must present after Ted. Therefore we have Ted, Catherine.

There must be one presenter between Bianca and Catherine, therefore we have: Bianca, x, Catherine. x is the name of the presenter between  Bianca and Catherine. Since Ted presents immediately before Catherine, x = Ted. This means we have Bianca, Ted, Catherine.

There must be at least two other people must present after Edward and before Ted. This means we have Edward, y, Bianca, Ted, Catherine. y is the name of the presenter between Edward and Bianca.. Since we have only five presenters, the only presenter remaining is Lily.

Therefore the presenters are arranged as:

Edward, Lily, Bianca, Ted, Catherine.

Lily is the second to present. Lily would present immediately after Edward and before Bianca

8 0
2 years ago
Question 1 Show all your work. Indicate clearly the methods you use, because you will be scored on the correctness of your metho
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

(a) The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all people in the United States who would indicate that their favorite sport to watch on television is American football is (0.34, 0.40).

(b) Not reasonable.

Step-by-step explanation:

The information provided is:

<em>n</em> = 1000

\hat p = 0.37

(a)

The (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for the population proportion <em>p</em> is:

CI=\hat p\pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}

Here,

\hat p = sample proportion

<em>n </em>= sample size

z_{\alpha/2} = critical value of <em>z</em>.

Compute the critical value of <em>z</em> for 95% confidence interval as follows:

z_{\alpha/2}=z_{0.05/2}=z_{0.025}=1.96

*Use a <em>z</em>-table for the value.

Compute the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion <em>p </em>as follows:

CI=\hat p\pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}

     =0.37\pm 1.96\times\sqrt{\frac{0.37(1-0.37)}{1000}}

     =0.37\pm 0.03\\=(0.34, 0.40)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all people in the United States who would indicate that their favorite sport to watch on television is American football is (0.34, 0.40).

(b)

Now we need to determine whether it is reasonable to believe that the actual percent of people in the United States whose favorite sport to watch on television is American football is 33%.

The hypothesis can be defined as:

<em>H₀</em>: The percentage of people in the United States whose favorite sport to watch on television is American football is 33%, i.e. <em>p</em> = 0.33.

<em>Hₐ</em>: The percentage of people in the United States whose favorite sport to watch on television is American football is different from 33%, i.e. <em>p</em> ≠ 0.33

The hypothesis can be tested based on a confidence interval.

The decision rule:

If the (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval includes the null value of the test then the null hypothesis will not be rejected. And if the (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval includes the null value of the test then the null hypothesis will be rejected.

The 95 confidence interval for the proportion of all people in the United States who would indicate that their favorite sport to watch on television is American football is (0.34, 0.40).

The confidence interval does includes the null value of <em>p</em>, i.e. 0.33.

So, the null hypothesis will be rejected.

Hence, concluding that is is not reasonable to believe that 33% is the actual percent of people in the United States whose favorite sport to watch on television is American football.

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Each cupcake costs $4.00 how many cupcakes (x) are purchased if the total cost is $36.00
    11·2 answers
  • Louis started a table showing a multiplication patterns complete the table describe a pattern you see in the products
    15·1 answer
  • In a random sample of 130 students, only 7 had been placed in the wrong math class. What is the best point estimate for the prop
    10·1 answer
  • On his first day of school, Kareem found the high temperature in degrees Fahrenheit to be 76.1°. He plans to use the function to
    13·2 answers
  • A debt of $450 is to be shared equally among the members of the Outing Club. When five of the members refuse to pay, the other m
    15·1 answer
  • Every 3 days Marco fills up his car with gas. Every 8 days he washes his car. On what day will Marco fill his car with gas and w
    10·2 answers
  • 12. Elly's credit card record for the last 7 months is below. Based on the information from the table, what will be her new bala
    6·2 answers
  • A certain brand of jelly beans are made so that each package contains about the same number of beans. The filling procedure is n
    13·1 answer
  • CL 6-131. Solve each system using the method of your choice.
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP , WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTTT
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!