Answer:
Data is quantitative, data is categorical, data must be from a simple random sample, the data mut have normal distribution,
Step-by-step explanation:
When we make inference about one population proportion, we must ensure that the sample was taken randomly and observations follow a normal distribution. The sample size must be as large as possible with at least 10 counts of failures an 10 counts of successes. The individual observations must be independent. They must be quantified and categorized.
GFC is 8. Use a tree of 88 and 48. 88= 2^3 x 11 or 2 x 2 x 2 x 11
48=2^4 x 3 or 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 see how many groups count as the number once and multiply and bam GFC. Hope I helped! (:
According to the triangle sum theorem, all the angles in a triangle must add up to 180 degrees. If we know one angle is already 90, we do 180-90=90. The other 2 angles must add up to 90, exactly.
Answer:
An alternative definition for the acceleration ax that can be written in terms of 
and 
is 
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that :
Now we are supposed to find an alternative definition for the acceleration ax that can be written in terms of and
So, We will use chain rule over here :
![a_x=\frac{dv_x}{dt}\\a_x=\frac{dv_x}{dt} \times \frac{dx}{dx}\\a_x=\frac{dv_x}{dx} \times \frac{dx}{dt}\\a_x=\frac{dv_x}{dx} \times \frac{dx}{dt} [\frac{dx}{dt}=v_x]\\a_x=\frac{dv_x}{dx} \times v_x\\a_x=v_x\frac{dv_x}{dx}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a_x%3D%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdt%7D%5C%5Ca_x%3D%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdt%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7Bdx%7D%7Bdx%7D%5C%5Ca_x%3D%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7Bdx%7D%7Bdt%7D%5C%5Ca_x%3D%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7Bdx%7D%7Bdt%7D%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bdx%7D%7Bdt%7D%3Dv_x%5D%5C%5Ca_x%3D%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%5Ctimes%20v_x%5C%5Ca_x%3Dv_x%5Cfrac%7Bdv_x%7D%7Bdx%7D)
Hence an alternative definition for the acceleration ax that can be written in terms of and is
Answer: The answer is Yes.
Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.
Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.
Thus, Radric's definition is valid.
