Answer:
her work is correct but there is one solution rather than no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
- hmmmmm but the equation is better t there but I think this should be it
- Assuming the equation was given
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case the population represent all the professional athletes in the researcher city and we can assume that the sample size for tis population is N =982 and represent all the individuals of interest for the study and the parameter of interest is the proportion of athletes who believe that the enforcement of safety measures needs to be completely overhauled .
In order to estimate te parameters of the population the researcher select a sample of 400 professional athletes and just 86 of them returns the questionnaire sent. So then the real sample is the n =86 people who return the info, because the other people are part of the non response rate, and from this sample she found that the proportion of athletes who believe that the enforcement of safety measures needs to be completely overhauled is .
<h2>p=0.76</h2>
Part A: 5 is the coefficient, w is the variable, 50 is the constant
Part B: 10 x 5 = 50 + 2 x 20 = 40+ 50 = $140
Part C: the constant,50,would change and become 85. Hope this helps :)
The main thing you want to ask yourself is "What is the difference between the two graphs?"
As we can see, the graphs look identical in every way except that g(x) is lower than f(x).
This means that the graph is shifted down a certain amount.
If we look at the y-intercepts of the two functions, we see that f(x) has a y-intercept of 1, and g(x) has a y-intercept of -1.
This means that f(x) is two units lower than g(x).
The y-intercept of a function can be changed by adding or subtracting a number to the original function (in this case 2^{x}).
Because the graph f(x) is 2 lower than the graph of g(x), we can find g(x) by subtracting 2 from f(x).
Therefore, g(x) = 2^{x} - 2.
