Hello. Unfortunately you did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if the text it refers to is read. In this text, you should look for the moment that shows the incident at the mosque and analyze why the way Adnan behaved in that incident was so disturbing and uncomfortable for the people present at the place. This behavior should be linked to the motives that led Adnan to be accused of murder, where you will see if his behavior is related to the charge, making it easier to show that Adnan is guilty of the charges he receives.
The answer is: conditioned stimulus (CS)
Conditioned stimulus refers to the neutral stimulus that trigger a specific response after being associated for a prolonged period of time with unconditioned stimulus.
In the case above:
- the toilet flush is previously a neutral stimulus that does not trigger any response.
- The toilet flush later on paired with unconditioned stimulus (hot water) that make jeff scream in pain
- Because of this, the toilet flush become a conditioned stimulus. This make jeff associate the toilet flush with hot water and make him twitch whenever he hear toilet flush while bathing.
What would likely be described in the given situation is
that the student’s coolness and his way of clothing has a connection in a
casual cycle and the coolness in which is being described to him is more of a
construction, rather than to be called as a fact.
Answer: Deliberative
Explanation: Arguments which are embarked upon by members of a group usually in other to explain the different sides of a particular topic. In other words, deliberative arguments usually involves members of a group which work collectively to show people the pros and cons of a certain topic or subject before finally arriving at a certain general conclusion or consensus. In deliberative arguments, the objective or goal of the topic is already known by the collaborating proposed, but in other to resolve underlying unambiguities, participants first come up with different and incompatible views before finally reaching a consensus.
Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
