All categories

2 years ago

How do the ongoing processes of scientific investigation and technological design interact with each other?

Chemistry

2 answers:

Maru [420]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is option a, that is, scientific investigation discovers new information that can be used in technological design, and technological design provides new products that can further scientific investigation.

Explanation:

Both science and technology possesses distinct objectives, ways of knowing and observing the world, and therefore, their association is usually complex and tense. Though, they work to extend and inform each other in both the unexpected and intended manners. Student learning in science and technology can be benefited via their conjoint study.

Yuri [45]2 years ago

4 0

Answer is
<span>a.Scientific investigation discovers new information that can be used in technological design, and technological design provides new products that can further scientific investigation.

Scientific investigation helps to discover new information, such as greater insight into how the world works. This information can be applied to technological design, illuminating new ways to do things. </span>

You might be interested in

Identify the number of moles in 369 grams of calcium hydroxide. Use the periodic table and the polyatomic ion resource.

topjm [15]

Answer : The number of moles in 369 grams of calcium hydroxide is, 4.98 moles

Explanation : Given,

Mass of calcium hydroxide = 369 g

Molar mass of calcium hydroxide = 74.093 g/mole

Formula used :

$\text{Moles of calcium hydroxide}=\frac{\text{Mass of calcium hydroxide}}{\text{Molar mass of calcium hydroxide}}$

Now put all the given values in this formula, we get the moles of calcium hydroxide.

$\text{Moles of calcium hydroxide}=\frac{369g}{74.093g/mole}=4.98mole$

Therefore, the number of moles in 369 grams of calcium hydroxide is, 4.98 moles

7 0

2 years ago

A flask of volume 2.0 liters, provided with a stopcock, contains oxygen at 20 oC, 1.0 ATM (1.013X105 Pa). The system is heated t

leonid [27]

Answer:

1.27 atm is the final pressure of the oxygen in the flask (with the stopcock closed).

2.6592 grams of oxygen remain in the flask.

Explanation:

Volume of the flask remains constant = V = 2.0 L

Initial pressure of the oxygen gas = $P_1=1.0 atm$

Initial temperature of the oxygen gas = $T_1=20^oC =293.15 K$

Final pressure of the oxygen gas = $P_2=?$

Final temperature of the oxygen gas = $T_2=100^oC =373.15 K$

Using Gay Lussac's law:

$\frac{P_1}{T_1}=\frac{P_2}{T_2}$

$P_2=\frac{P_1\times T_2}{T_1}=\frac{1 atm\times 373.15 K}{293.15 K}=1.27 atm$

1.27 atm is the final pressure of the oxygen in the flask (with the stopcock closed).

Moles of oxygen gas = n

$P_1V_1=nRT_1$ (ideal gas equation)

$n=\frac{P_1V_1}{RT_1}=\frac{1 atm\times 2.0 L}{0.0821 atm l/mol K\times 293.15 K}=0.08310 mol$

Mass of 0.08310 moles of oxygen gas:

0.08310 mol × 32 g/mol = 2.6592 g

2.6592 grams of oxygen remain in the flask.

6 0

2 years ago

10 points) Given the following two half-reactions, write the overall reaction in the direction in which it is product-favored, a

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

The over all reaction :

$2Fe^{3+}(aq)+Pb(s)\rightarrow 2Fe^{2+}(s)+Pb^{2+}(aq)$

The standard cell potential of the reaction is 0,.897 Volts.

Explanation:

Reduction at cathode :

$Fe^{3+}(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Fe^{2+}(s)$ ..[1]

$E^o_{Fe^{3+}/Fe^{2+}}=0.771 V$

Reduction potential of $Fe^{3+}$ to $Fe^{2+}=0.771 V$

Oxidation at anode:

$Pb(s)\rightarrow Pb^{2+}(aq)+2e^-$ .[2]

$E^o_{Pb^{2+}/Pb}=-0.126 V$

Reduction potential of $Pb^{3+}$ to $Pb=-0.126 V$

To calculate the $E^o_{cell}$ of the reaction, we use the equation:

$E^o_{cell}=E^o_{red,cathode}-E^o_{red,anode}$

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$E^o_{cell}=E^o_{Fe^{3+}/Fe^{2+}}-E^o_{Pb^{2+}/Pb}$

$=0.771 V-(-0.126 )=0.897 V$

The over all reaction : 2 × [1] + [2]

$2Fe^{3+}(aq)+Pb(s)\rightarrow 2Fe^{2+}(s)+Pb^{2+}(aq)$

The standard cell potential of the reaction is 0,.897 Volts.

7 0

2 years ago

Witch of the following isotopes would most likely be unstable and therefore radioactive?

STALIN [3.7K]

The answer is D; Mercury-194
All of the others are not when I looked them up

5 0

2 years ago

Compare properties of covalent compounds and ionic compounds. Which of the following properties differ because of differences in

____ [38]

Answer:

The answer to your question is below

Explanation:

ionic compounds covalent compounds

1.- Mass it does not depend on the type of compound

2.- Conductivity -conduct electricity - do not conduct electricity

in solution.

3.- Color - Shiny - opaque

4.- Melting point - high - lower than ionic compounds

5.- Boiling point - high - lower than ionic compounds

6.- flammability - not flammable - flammable

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers