All categories

2 years ago

At 25 Â°c only 0.0470 mol of the generic salt ab3 is soluble in 1.00 l of water. what is the ksp of the salt at 25 Â°c?

1 answer:

4 0

When we have the balanced equation for this reaction:
AB3 ↔ A+3 + 3B-
So we can get Ksp:
when Ksp = [A+3][B-]^3
when [A+3] = 0.047 mol and from the balanced equation when
1 mol [A+3] → 3 mol [B-]
0.047 [A+3] → ??
[B-] = 3*0.047 = 0.141
so by substitution in Ksp formula:
∴Ksp = 0.047 * 0.141^3
= 1.32x10^-4

You might be interested in

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a common and troublesome pollutant in industrial wastewaters. One way to remove H2S is to treat the wa

Kryger [21]

Explanation:

As the given reaction is as follows.

$H_{2}S(aq) + Cl_{2}(aq) \rightarrow S(s) + 2H^{+}(aq) + 2Cl^{-}(aq)$

So, according to the balanced equation, it can be seen that rate of formation of $Cl^{-}$ will be twice the rate of disappearance of $H_{2}S$ .

And, it is known that rate of disappearance of reactant will be negative and rate of formation of products will be positive value.

This means that,

Rate of the reaction = -Rate of disappearance of $H_{2}S$

= $k[H_{2}S][Cl_{2}]$

= $(3.5 \times 10^{-2}) \times (2 \times 10^{-4}) \times (2.8 x 10^{-2})$

= $1.96 \times 10^{-7}$ M/s

Therefore, calculate the rate of formation of $Cl^{-}$ as follows.

Rate of formation of $Cl^{-}$ = $2 \times 1.96 \times 10^{-7}$

= $3.92 \times 10^{-7}$ M/s

Thus, we can conclude that the rate of formation of $Cl^{-}$ is $3.92 \times 10^{-7}$ M/s.

5 0

2 years ago

Modern commercial airliners are largely made of aluminum, a light and strong metal. But the fact that aluminum is cheap enough t

Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

The plane with aluminium can lift more mass of passangers than the plane of steel.

Explanation:

The total mass the airplane canc lift is:

$m_{tot}=m_{fuselage}+m_{passangers}$

For aluminium:

$m_{tot}=m_{fus-Al}+m_{pas-Al}$

$m_{fus-Al}=\delta _{Al}*V_{fuselage}$

and

$V_{fuselage}=\frac{\pi *L}{4}*[D^2-(D-e)^2]$

where:

L is lenght
D is diameter
e is thickness

$m_{tot}=\delta _{Al}*\frac{\pi *L}{4}*[D^2-(D-e)^2]+m_{pas-Al}$

For steel (same procedure):

$m_{tot}=\delta _{Steel}*\frac{\pi *L}{4}*[D^2-(D-e)^2]+m_{pas-Steel$

Knowing that the total mass the airplane can lift is constant and that aluminum has a lower density than the steel, we can afirm that the plane with aluminium can lift more mass of passangers.

Also you can estimate an average weight of passanger to estimate a number of passangers it can lift.

5 0

2 years ago

Ka, the acid dissociation constant, for an acid is 9 × 10^{−4} at room temperature. At this temperature, what is the approximate

devlian [24]

Dissociation=k×no of moles
percentage of dissociation=9.0×10^-4×1×100
knowing that x%=x/100,we then say;
x/100=9.0×10^-4×1×100
therefore, x=100×100×9×10^-4×1
x=9
x percentage of dissociation=9%

8 0

2 years ago

Combustion of gasoline in automobiles produces poisonous gases. Catalytic converters that contain solid platinum, palladium, and

bagirrra123 [75]

It provides an alternative pathway for the rxn.

5 0

2 years ago

Daphne is a pilot for a package delivery service. As her plane takes off and travels away from the Earth’s surface, its gravitat

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

its height relative to some reference point, its mass, and the strength of the gravitational field

Explanation:

Gravitational energy is the potential energy associated with gravitational force, such as elevating objects against the Earth’s gravity. The potential energy due to elevated positions is called gravitational potential energy.

The factors that affect an object’s gravitational potential energy are the following; its height relative to some reference point, its mass, and the strength of the gravitational field it is in. For instance, consider a wallet lying on a table, it has less gravitational potential energy than the same wallet lying on top of a taller cupboard, and yet lesser gravitational potential energy than a heavier wallet lying on the same table.

If an object lies at a certain height above the Moon’s surface, it has less gravitational potential energy than the same object lying at the same height above the Earth’s surface because the Moon’s gravitational force is weaker.

5 0

2 years ago