Answer:

Explanation:
Given that;
I₀ = 9.55 A
f = 359 cycles/s
b = 72.2 cm
c = 32.5 cm
a = 80.2 cm
Using the formula;

where;



Replacing our values into above equation; we have:



Then the
is calculated as:



Answer:
According to the travellers, Alpha Centauri is <em>c) very slightly less than 4 light-years</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
For a stationary observer, Alpha Centauri is 4 light-years away but for an observer who is travelling close to the speed of light, Alpha Centauri is <em>very slightly less than 4 light-years. </em>The following expression explains why:
v = d / t
where
- v is the speed of the spaceship
- d is the distance
- t is the time
Therefore,
d = v × t
d = (0.999 c)(4 light-years)
d = 3.996 light-years
This distance is<em> very slightly less than 4 light-years. </em>
<span>f2 = f0/4
The gravity from the planet can be modeled as a point source at the center of the planet with all of the planet's mass concentrated at that point. So the initial condition for f0 has the satellite at a distance of 2r, where r equals the planet's radius.
The expression for the force of gravity is
F = G*m1*m2/r^2
where
F = Force
G = Gravitational constant
m1,m2 = masses involved
r = distance between center of masses.
Now for f2, the satellite has an altitude of 3r and when you add in the planet's radius, the distance from the center of the planet is now 4r. When you compare that to the original distance of 2r, that will show you that the satellite is now twice as far from the center of the planet as it was when it started. So let's compare the gravitational attraction, before and after.
f0 = G*m1*m2/r^2
f2 = G*m1*m2/(2r)^2
f2/f0 = (G*m1*m2/(2r)^2) / (G*m1*m2/r^2)
The Gm m1, and m2 terms cancel, so
f2/f0 = (1/(2r)^2) / (1/r^2)
f2/f0 = (1/4r^2) / (1/r^2)
And the r^2 terms cancel, so
f2/f0 = (1/4) / (1/1)
f2/f0 = (1/4) / 1
f2/f0 = 1/4
f2 = f0*1/4
f2 = f0/4
So the gravitational force on the satellite after tripling it's altitude is one fourth the original force.</span>
Answer:
6.78 X 10³ N/C
Explanation:
Electric field near a charged infinite plate
= surface charge density / 2ε₀
Field will be perpendicular to the surface of the plate for both the charge density and direction of field will be same so they will add up.
Field due to charge density of +95.0 nC/m2
E₁ = 95 x 10⁻⁹ / 2 ε₀
Field due to charge density of -25.0 nC/m2
E₂ = 25 x 10⁻⁹ / 2ε₀
Total field
E = E₁ + E₂
= 95 x 10⁻⁹ / 2 ε₀ + 25 x 10⁻⁹ / 2ε₀
= 6.78 X 10³ N/C
Answer:
The distribution is as depicted in the attached figure.
Explanation:
From the given data
- The plane wall is initially with constant properties is initially at a uniform temperature, To.
- Suddenly the surface x=L is exposed to convection process such that T∞>To.
- The other surface x=0 is maintained at To
- Uniform volumetric heating q' such that the steady state temperature exceeds T∞.
Assumptions which are valid are
- There is only conduction in 1-D.
- The system bears constant properties.
- The volumetric heat generation is uniform
From the given data, the condition are as follows
<u>Initial Condition</u>
At t≤0

This indicates that initially the temperature distribution was independent of x and is indicated as a straight line.
<u>Boundary Conditions</u>
<u>At x=0</u>
<u />
<u />
This indicates that the temperature on the x=0 plane will be equal to To which will rise further due to the volumetric heat generation.
<u>At x=L</u>
<u />
<u />
This indicates that at the time t, the rate of conduction and the rate of convection will be equal at x=L.
The temperature distribution along with the schematics are given in the attached figure.
Further the heat flux is inferred from the temperature distribution using the Fourier law and is also as in the attached figure.
It is important to note that as T(x,∞)>T∞ and T∞>To thus the heat on both the boundaries will flow away from the wall.