<span>Calculating the number of kg of each ingredient required per batch is nothing more than multiplying the number of kg per bag times 250. But the information given is woefully inadequate for answering the second part of the question. All you know is the cost of the ingredients and nothing about the fixed costs of running the factory, nor the company's G&A, nor the desired profit margin. If they sell just for the cost of the ingredients, they would go broke in a month.
</span><span>John
e^i^pie + 1 = 0</span>
Answer:
Carmen's score is 75 strokes.
Linda's score is 81 strokes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the score of Linda be "x".
<em>It is given that Carmen's golf score is 6 strokes less than Linda's.</em>
Thus, Carmen's score is (x-6).
The total score of the girls is
= 
The total score is given to be 156.
Thus, the equation becomes,



<em>Thus Linda's score is 81 and Carmen's score is (156-81) 75.</em>
Answer:
Third option: 
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3><em> The correct form of the exercise is: "The point-slope form of the equation of a line that passes through points (8, 4) and (0, 2) is

. What is the slope-intercept form of the equation for this line?"</em></h3><h3><em /></h3>
<em> </em>The equation of the line in Slope-Intercept form is:

Where "m" is the slope and "b" is the y-intercept.
Given the equation of the line in Point-Slope form:

You need to solve for "y" in order to write the given equation of the line in Slope Intercept form.
Then, this is:

You can identify that the slope "m" is:

And the y-interecept "b" is:

In order to find the sum of the given rational expressions above, here are the steps.
Firstly, you need to find the LCM of the least common denominator.
So it would look like this:
<span>3x-1 + 3x (3x-1)(x-1) + (2x)(3x)
------ ------- = ---------------------------
2x x-1 2x(x-1)
3x^2-4x+1+6x^2
----------------------
2x(x-1)
And the final result would be this:
9x^2-4x+1
--------------
2x(x-1)
</span>9x^2-4x+1
--------------
2x^2-2x
<span>
Hope that this is the answer that you are looking for.
</span>
The statments that justify this eqaution would be:
inverse - addition
inverse - multiplication