Answer:
11 inches by 11 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
The dimensions of the original photo were 11 inches by 11 inches.
We are informed that the area of the reduced photo is 64 square inches and that In the equation (x – 3)^2 = 64, x represents the side measure of the original photo.
In order to solve for x, we shall first take square roots on both sides of the equation;
The square root of (x – 3)^2 is simply (x - 3).
The square root of 64 is ±8 but we ignore -8 since the dimensions of any figure must be positive.
Therefore, we have the following equation;
x - 3 = 8
x = 8 + 3
x = 11
Answer:
<u>Option B</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is as following:

Step Work Justification
1 2x + 6x − 4 = 12
2 8x − 4 = 12
3 8x = 16
4 x = 2
Which of the following has all of the correct justifications Wyatt used to solve this equation?
A. Distributive property. 2. Combine like terms. 3. Addition property of equality. 4. Division property of equality.
B. Multiplication property of equality. 2. Combine like terms. 3. Addition property of equality. 4. Division property of equality.
C. Distributive property. 2. Combine like terms. 3. Subtraction property of equality. 4. Division property of equality.
D. Multiplication property of equality. 2. Combine like terms. 3. Subtraction property of equality. 4. Division property of equality
<u />
<u>The answer:</u>
Step Work Justification
multiply both sides by 2
1) 2x + 6x − 4 = 12 ⇒ {Multiplication property of equality}
{Combine like terms}
2) 8x − 4 = 12 ⇒
Adding 4 both sides
3) 8x = 16 ⇒ {Addition property of equality}
divide both sides by 8
4) x = 2 ⇒ {Division property of equality}
The answer is option B
(B) Multiplication property of equality. 2. Combine like terms. 3. Addition property of equality. 4. Division property of equality.
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
15.5 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Patty is building a rope ladder tree house she needs two 4 foot pieces of rope for the sides of the ladder.
She needs 6 pieces of rope each 15 inches long for the steps.
Question asked:
How many feet of rope does patty need to make the ladder ?
Solution:
She needs for the sides of the ladder = Two 4 foot pieces of rope
= 2
4 feet = 8 feet
She needs for the steps of the ladder = 6 pieces of 15 inches long rope
= 6
15 inches = 90 inches
Convert 90 inches into feet:-
12 inches = 1 feet
1 inches = 
90 inches = 
Patty needs total rope = 8 feet + 7.5 feet
= 15.5 feet
Thus, Patty needs 15.5 feet of rope to make the ladder.