Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
c !!
Answer:
answer is

Step-by-step explanation:
After working this way for 6 months he takes a simple random sample of 15 days. He records how long he walked that day (in hours) as recorded by his fitness watch as well as his billable hours for that day as recorded by a work app on his computer.
Slope is -0.245
Sample size n = 15
Standard error is 0.205
Confidence level 95
Sognificance level is (100 - 95)% = 0.05
Degree of freedom is n -2 = 15 -2 = 13
Critical Value =2.16 = [using excel = TINV (0.05, 13)]
Marginal Error = Critical Value * standard error
= 2.16 * 0.205
= 0.4428

Answer:
c.Approximately normal
Step-by-step explanation:
The manufacturer had done some test and the result is that the impact forces of the car are normally distributed. Since the sample of the test will be the same kind of car, then the distribution type of the sample will be normal too. Normal distribution will not be skewed to right or left, the data will look like a symmetrical bell shape.
Answer:
The profit margin for the concert sponsorship is 31.3725 %
Step-by-step explanation:
An arena receives for 1 event = $1700
An arena receives for 12 events = 
An arena receives for 12 events = 20400
The costs for this sponsorship total $14,000
Profit = 20400-14000
Profit =6400
Profit margin =
Profit margin = 
Hence the profit margin for the concert sponsorship is 31.3725 %
Answer:
No. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population standard deviation is different from $12.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is that the true standard deviation is 12.
The alternative hypothesis is that the true standard deviation differs from 12.
We can state:

The significance level is 0.10.
The sample size is n=15, so the degrees of freedom are:

The sample standard deviation is 9.25.
The test statistic is

The critical values for rejecting the null hypothesis are:

As T=8.32 is within the acceptance region (5.01, 24.74), the null hypothesis failed to be rejected.
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population standard deviation is different from $12.