Question

A news article reports that "Americans have differing views on two potentially inconvenient and invasive practices that airports could implement to uncover potential terrorist attacks." This news piece was based on a survey conducted among a random sample of 1,137 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone November 7-10, 2010, where one of the questions on the survey was "Some airports are now using ‘full-body’ digital x-ray machines to electronically screen passengers in airport security lines. Do you think these new x-ray machines should or should not be used at airports?" Below is a summary of responses based on party affiliation :
Party Affiliation
Republican Democrat Independent
Should 264 299 351
Answer Should Not 38 55 77
Dont Know/ No Answer 16 15 22
Total 316 369 450
(SHOW ANY WORK)

(a) Conduct an appropriate hypothesis test evaluating whether there is a difference in the proportion of Republicans and Democrats who think the full-body scans should be applied in airports. Assume that all relevant conditions are met.

(b) The conclusion of the test in part (a) may be incorrect, meaning a testing error was made. If an error was made, was it a Type 1 or a Type 2 Error? Explain.

Answer 1

Answer:

(a) there is a little difference in proportion clearly from the data given as observed.

(B) if a conclusion In the test part (a) is incorrect then a type 1 error was made.

Step-by-step explanation:

In statistical hypothesis testing:

type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis while

a type II error is the non-rejection of a false null hypothesis.