Behaviorists generally claimed that conditioning occurred without thinking or reasoning ans was simply a result of consequences or reinforcement. Cognitive psychologists demonstrated that thinking and reasoning (cognition) influences the conditioning processes and that many behaviors that are conditioned depend on the type of cognitive reasoning that occurs during conditioning. Therefore, as one is being conditioned to respond to environmental stimuli or is responding to a consequence, they are also pondering and thinking about the process occuring. Cognition is often the reason individuals are not all conditioned in the same manner.
Answer:1. Roche limit
2.hydrogen
3.atmosphere
4.mercury
5.venus
6.when an object passes the Roche limit, the strength of gravity on the object increases. If the density of the planet is higher, then the object can break up farther away from the planet. If the density is lower, then the Roche limit is located closer to the planet
7.Farther our in the solar system, beyond the frost line, hydrogen was at a low enough temperature that it could condense. This allowed hydrogen to accumulate under gravity, eventually forming the Jovian planets
Explanation:
I don't understand what you mean by "depth" of the steps. The flat part of the step has a front-to-back dimension, and the 'riser' has a height. I don't care about the horizontal dimension of the step because it doesn't add anything to the climber's potential energy. And if the riser of each step is 20cm high, then 3,234 of them only take him (3,234 x 0.2) = 646.8 meters up off the ground. So something is definitely fishy about the steps.
Fortunately, we don't need to worry at all about the steps in order to derive a first approximation to the answer ... one that's certainly good enough for high school Physics.
In order to lift his bulk 828 meters from the street to the top of the Burj, the climber has to provide a force of 800 newtons, and maintain it through a distance of 828 meters. The work [s]he does is (force) x (distance) = <em>662,400 joules. </em>
Answer:
i(t) = (E/R)[1 - exp(-Rt/L)]
Explanation:
E−vR−vL=0
E− iR− Ldi/dt = 0
E− iR = Ldi/dt
Separating te variables,
dt/L = di/(E - iR)
Let x = E - iR, so dx = -Rdi and di = -dx/R substituting for x and di we have
dt/L = -dx/Rx
-Rdt/L = dx/x
interating both sides, we have
∫-Rdt/L = ∫dx/x
-Rt/L + C = ㏑x
x = exp(-Rt/L + C)
x = exp(-Rt/L)exp(C) A = exp(C) we have
x = Aexp(-Rt/L) Substituting x = E - iR we have
E - iR = Aexp(-Rt/L) when t = 0, i(0) = 0. So
E - i(0)R = Aexp(-R×0/L)
E - 0 = Aexp(0) = A × 1
E = A
So,
E - i(t)R = Eexp(-Rt/L)
i(t)R = E - Eexp(-Rt/L)
i(t)R = E(1 - exp(-Rt/L))
i(t) = (E/R)(1 - exp(-Rt/L))
Answer:
a) When its length is 23 cm, the elastic potential energy of the spring is
0.18 J
b) When the stretched length doubles, the potential energy increases by a factor of four to 0.72 J
Explanation:
Hi there!
a) The elastic potential energy (EPE) is calculated using the following equation:
EPE = 1/2 · k · x²
Where:
k = spring constant.
x = stretched lenght.
Let´s calculate the elastic potential energy of the spring when it is stretched 3 cm (0.03 m).
First, let´s convert the spring constant units into N/m:
4 N/cm · 100 cm/m = 400 N/m
EPE = 1/2 · 400 N/m · (0.03 m)²
EPE = 0.18 J
When its length is 23 cm, the elastic potential energy of the spring is 0.18 J
b) Now let´s calculate the elastic potential energy when the spring is stretched 0.06 m:
EPE = 1/2 · 400 N/m · (0.06 m)²
EPE = 0.72 J
When the stretched length doubles, the potential energy increases by a factor of four to 0.72 J
