Answer:
The answer to your question is below
Explanation:
ionic compounds covalent compounds
1.- Mass it does not depend on the type of compound
2.- Conductivity -conduct electricity - do not conduct electricity
in solution.
3.- Color - Shiny - opaque
4.- Melting point - high - lower than ionic compounds
5.- Boiling point - high - lower than ionic compounds
6.- flammability - not flammable - flammable
Answer : The cell emf for this cell is 0.118 V
Solution :
The half-cell reaction is:
In this case, the cathode and anode both are same. So, 
is equal to zero.
Now we have to calculate the cell emf.
Using Nernest equation :
![E_{cell}=E^o_{cell}-\frac{0.0592}{n}\log \frac{[Cl^{-}{diluted}]}{[Cl^{-}{concentrated}]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7Bcell%7D%3DE%5Eo_%7Bcell%7D-%5Cfrac%7B0.0592%7D%7Bn%7D%5Clog%20%5Cfrac%7B%5BCl%5E%7B-%7D%7Bdiluted%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BCl%5E%7B-%7D%7Bconcentrated%7D%5D%7D)
where,
n = number of electrons in oxidation-reduction reaction = 1
= ?
![[Cl^{-}{diluted}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCl%5E%7B-%7D%7Bdiluted%7D%5D)
= 0.0222 M
![[Cl^{-}{concentrated}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCl%5E%7B-%7D%7Bconcentrated%7D%5D)
= 2.22 M
Now put all the given values in the above equation, we get:
Therefore, the cell emf for this cell is 0.118 V
Answer:
Ionization energy
Electronegativity
Explanation:
-due to its smaller ionic radius....the electron in the outter most shell tends to expierence a stronger nuclear attraction...which makes it harder to remove the electron from the sodium atom
-Rubidium has lesser ionization energy because its (i) affected by its larger ionic radius which tends to lessen the nuclear attraction ...hence making it easier to remove the electron...(ii)and also by the screening effect done by the inner shells, which also tends to lessen the nuclear attraction.
Sodium has a higher electronegativity than rubidium;
Electronegativity is the charge density of electrons in an atom...in which its high when the atomic radius is smaller...
So hence due to the sodium atomic radius being smaller...it tends to have a higher charge density than rubidium....which then gives it a higher electronegativity value
Is there some kind of diagram? how is your finger pushing the coin, and where? It may be:
1)friction against a surface
2)push from the finger
3)gravity
4)air resistance behind the coin
Answer:
MnO- Manganese Oxide
Explanation:
Empirical formula: This is the formula that shows the ratio of elements
present in a
compound.
How to determine Empirical formula
1. First arrange the symbols of the elements present in the compound
alphabetically to determine the real empirical formula. Although, there
are exceptions to this rule, E.g H2So4
2. Divide the percentage composition by the mass number.
3. Then divide through by the smallest number.
4. The resulting answer is the ratio attached to the elements present in
a compound.
Mn O
% composition 72.1 27.9
Divide by mass number 54.94 16
1.31 1.74
Divide by the smallest number 1.31 1.31
1 1.3
The resulting ratio is 1:1
Hence the Empirical formula is MnO, Manganese oxide
