Answer:
24.39mL of the solution would be given per hour.
Step-by-step explanation:
This problem can be solved by direct rule of three, in which there are a direct relationship between the measures, which means that the rule of three is a cross multiplication.
The first step to solve this problem is to see how many mg of the solution is administered per hour.
Each minute, 200 ug are administered. 1mg has 1000ug, so
1mg - 1000 ug
xmg - 200 ug



In each minute, 0.2 mg are administered. Each hour has 60 minutes. How many mg are administered in 60 minutes?
1 minute - 0.2 mg
60 minutes - x mg


In an hour, 12 mg of the drug is administered. In 250 mL, there is 123 mg of the drug. How many ml are there in 12 mg of the drug.
123mg - 250mL
12 mg - xmL


mL
24.39mL of the solution would be given per hour.
Answer:
There is 8% (P=0.08) that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have one-sample z-test with a significance level of 0.08 and a power ot the test of 0.85.
In this test, the null hypothesis will state that the new equipment has the same productivity of the older equipment. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significative improvement from the use of new equipment.
The probability that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect is equal to the probability of making a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis).
The probability of making a Type I error is defined by the level of significance, and in this test this value is α=0.08.
Then, there is 8% that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect.
E+7 means 10^+7
basically move the decimal place 7 placs to right so it would be aprox
38200000.0