Question

The length of a rectangular wall is 16.5 feet. The height of the wall is 8.625 feet. Cameron determines the area of the wall to be 1423.125 square feet. Which best explains the reasonableness of Cameron’s solution? Cameron’s solution is reasonable because there are four decimal places in the factors and four decimal places in the product. Cameron’s solution is reasonable because there are three decimal places in the factors and three decimal places in the product. Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because mc023-1.jpg is 153, and 153 is not close to his product. Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because mc023-2.jpg is 100, and 100 is not close to his product.

Answer 1

Answer:

Cameron solution is not reasonable, because it must have 4 decimals points, not three.

Step-by-step explanation:

When calculating the area of the rectangular wall, we have to multiply 16.5ft(8.625ft), if we observe, we have 4 decimals in total. The multiplications results 142.3125. So, Cameron solution is not reasonable, because he only included three decimals points, instead of four.

$16.5ft(8.625ft)=142.3125ft^{2}$

Answer 2

Answer:

I think c im dumb tho so like dont trust me?

Step-by-step explanation: