We really can't tell from the given information.
We don't know HOW MUCH Marv enlarged his cannonballs,
or HOW MUCH faster Seymour's balls became.
If we assume that they both, let's say, DOUBLED something,
then Seymour accomplished more, and the destructive capability
of his balls has increased more.
I say that because the destructive capability of a cannonball is
pretty much just its kinetic energy when it arrives and hits the target.
Now, we all know the equation for kinetic energy.
K.E. = (1/2) (mass) (speed-SQUARED) .
We can see right away that if Marv started shooting balls with
double the mass but at the same speed, then they have double
the kinetic energy of the old ones.
But if Seymour started shooting the same balls with double the SPEED,
then they have (2-SQUARED) as much kinetic energy as they used to.
That's 4 times as much destructive capability as before.
So we can say that when it comes to cannons and their balls and
smashing things to bits and terrorizing your opponents, if making
a bigger mess is better, then more mass is better, but more speed
is better-squared.
The mass of the puck is
m = 0.15 kg.
The diameter of the puck is 0.076 m, therefore its radius is
r = 0.076/2 = 0.038 m
The sliding speed is
v = 0.5 m/s
The angular velocity is
ω = 8.4 rad/s
The rotational moment of inertia of the puck is
I = (mr²)/2
= 0.5*(0.15 kg)*(0.038 m)²
= 1.083 x 10⁻⁴ kg-m²
The kinetic energy of the puck is the sum of the translational and rotational kinetic energy.
The translational KE is
KE₁ = (1/2)*m*v²
= 0.5*(0.15 kg)*(0.5 m/s)²
= 0.0187 j
The rotational KE is
KE₂ = (1/2)*I*ω²
= 0.5*(1.083 x 10⁻⁴ kg-m²)*(8.4 rad/s)²
= 0.0038 J
The total KE is
KE = 0.0187 + 0.0038 = 0.0226 J
Answer: 0.0226 J
Answer:
3.62 m and - 1.4 m
Explanation:
Consider a location towards the positive side of x-axis beyond the location of charge Q₂
x = distance of the location from charge Q₂
d = distance between the two charges = 2 m
For the electric field to be zero at the location
E₁ = Electric field by charge Q₁ at the location = E₂ = Electric field by charge Q₂ at the location


x = 1.62 m
So location is 2 + 1.62 = 3.62 m
Consider a location towards the negative side of x-axis beyond the location of charge Q₁
x = distance of the location from charge Q₁
d = distance between the two charges = 2 m
For the electric field to be zero at the location
E₁ = Electric field by charge Q₁ at the location = E₂ = Electric field by charge Q₂ at the location


x = - 1.4 m
It would be 17 m/s
If we use
V2 = V1 + a*t
Sub in 5 for v1
2m/s*2 for a
And
6 for t
That should give you the answer.
If Earth was twice as far from the sun, the force of gravity attracting the Earth to the sun would be only one-quarter as strong. The correct answer will be C.