answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentinak56 [21]
2 years ago
13

"On a map, 0.25 inches represents 1 mile. What is the area of a rectangle on the map that is 3.75 inches long and 2.25 inches wi

de?"
270 square miles
135 square miles
48 square miles
24 square miles
Mathematics
2 answers:
Vika [28.1K]2 years ago
6 0
0.25 inches represents 1 mile

----------------------------------------------
Find 1 inch:
----------------------------------------------
1 inch represents 1 ÷ 0.25 miles
1 inch represents 4 miles

----------------------------------------------
Find 3.75 inches:
----------------------------------------------
1 inch represents 4 miles
3.75 inches represent 4 x 3.75 miles
3.75 inches represent 15 miles

----------------------------------------------
Find 2.25 inches:
----------------------------------------------
1 inch represents 4 miles
2.25 inches represent 4 x 2.25 miles
2.25 inches represent 9 miles

----------------------------------------------
Find Area:
----------------------------------------------
Area = Length x Width
Area = 15 x 9 
Area = 135 miles²

----------------------------------------------
Answer: 135 miles²
----------------------------------------------
tamaranim1 [39]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

<u><em>135 Square Miles</em></u>

Step-by-step explanation:

On a map, 0.25 inches represents 1 mile. What is the area of a rectangle on the map that is 3.75 inches long and 2.25 inches wide?

270 square miles

<u><em>135 square miles</em></u>

48 square miles

24 square miles

Odyssey

You might be interested in
9. Darcy is buying apples and oranges for a large fruit basket to give away as a door prize at a charity event. Apples cost $0.2
Sladkaya [172]
Assume that the number of apples is x and the number of oranges is y.

For the first given, we know that each apple costs $0.24 and each orange costs $0.8, therefore:
amount paid for apples = 0.24x and amount paid for oranges = 0.8y
we also know that the total amount spent is $12, therefore the first equation is as follows:
0.24x + 0.8y = 12

For the second given, we know that the total number of fruit bought is 20, therefore, the second equation is:
x + y = 20

You can easily graph these two functions and find a possible combination from the graph (the correct combination would be the intersection between the two lines).


5 0
2 years ago
• A researcher claims that less than 40% of U.S. cell phone owners use their phone for most of their online browsing. In a rando
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

We failed to reject H₀

Z > -1.645

-1.84 > -1.645

We failed to reject H₀

p > α

0.03 > 0.01

We do not have significant evidence at a 1% significance level to claim that less than 40% of U.S. cell phone owners use their phones for most of their online browsing.

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up hypotheses:

Null hypotheses = H₀: p = 0.40

Alternate hypotheses = H₁: p < 0.40

Determine the level of significance and Z-score:

Given level of significance = 1% = 0.01

Since it is a lower tailed test,

Z-score = -2.33 (lower tailed)

Determine type of test:

Since the alternate hypothesis states that less than 40% of U.S. cell phone owners use their phone for most of their online browsing, therefore we will use a lower tailed test.

Select the test statistic:  

Since the sample size is quite large (n > 30) therefore, we will use Z-distribution.

Set up decision rule:

Since it is a lower tailed test, using a Z statistic at a significance level of 1%

We Reject H₀ if Z < -1.645

We Reject H₀ if p ≤ α

Compute the test statistic:

$ Z =  \frac{\hat{p} - p}{ \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} }}  $

$ Z =  \frac{0.31 - 0.40}{ \sqrt{\frac{0.40(1-0.40)}{100} }}  $

$ Z =  \frac{- 0.09}{ 0.048989 }  $

Z = - 1.84

From the z-table, the p-value corresponding to the test statistic -1.84 is

p = 0.03288

Conclusion:

We failed to reject H₀

Z > -1.645

-1.84 > -1.645

We failed to reject H₀

p >  α

0.03 > 0.01

We do not have significant evidence at a 1% significance level to claim that less than 40% of U.S. cell phone owners use their phones for most of their online browsing.

8 0
2 years ago
You’re assembling desserts with a friend. Together you can make 12 desserts in five minutes. Two more friends arrive and you are
Dafna1 [17]
Well there's 10 minutes in the second part so first 48/2 is 24. Now 24/4 (since there's 4 people so far) is 6, now 6*6 because there's now 6 people in total so the final answer is 36 in 5 minutes
8 0
2 years ago
At a financial services company, the mean percent allocation for bonds in a retirement portfolio is 26.9 percent with a populati
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer: it is a right tailed probability

Step-by-step explanation:

Population proportion = 26.9/100 = 0.269

We are dealing with the fact that the probability that the mean bond percent for the sample will be at least 28. This means that the sample proportion is 0.28 or above. This means that it is greater than the population proportion of 0.269

The hypothesis would be

For null hypothesis

p = 0.269

For alternative hypothesis,

p > 0.269

The inequality sign means that it is right tailed.

3 0
2 years ago
Henri has $24,000 invested in stocks and bonds. The amount in stocks is $6,000 more than three times the amount in bonds. How mu
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

<u>The amount of investment in bonds is US$ 4,500 and the amount of investment in stocks is US$ 19,500</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

Total investment in stocks and bonds = US$ 24,000

Amount of investment in bonds = x

Amount of investment in stocks = 3x + 6,000 (amount in stocks is $6,000 more than three times the amount in bonds)

For finding the value of x (amount of investment in bonds), we use this equation:

x + 3x + 6,000 = 24,000

x + 3x = 24,000 - 6,000

4x = 18,000

x = 4,500 (dividing by 4)

<u>The amount of investment in bonds is US$ 4,500</u>

Now let's find the amount of investment in stocks:

3x + 6,000 = 3 (4,500) + 6,000 = 13,500 + 6,000 = 19,500

<u>The amount of investment in stocks is US$ 19,500</u>

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • given: angle KLM and angle NML are right angles. angle 2 is congruent to angle 3. Prove: angle 1 is congruent to angle 4
    5·1 answer
  • Which graph correctly solves the system of equations below? y = −x2 − 1 y = 2x2 − 4 (6 points)
    6·2 answers
  • A greeting card company can produce a box of cards for $7.50. If the initial investment by the company was $50,000, how many box
    10·1 answer
  • Simplify (3 1/7)^7<br> Apex
    9·2 answers
  • A manufacturer wants to increase the shelf life of a line of cake mixes. Past records indicate that the average shelf life of th
    8·1 answer
  • An ideal gas is confined within a closed cylinder at a pressure of 2.026 × 105 Pa by a piston. The piston moves until the volume
    5·1 answer
  • Sportware, a leading shoe manufacturer, markets sneakers under the brand name "Athletix" and dress shoes under the brand name "C
    14·1 answer
  • On jeopardy there are 5 monetary categories- $100 $200 $300 $400 and $500. Each of them have an equally likely chance of popping
    9·1 answer
  • Which equation is y = 3(x – 2)2 – (x – 5)2 rewritten in vertex form? Y = 3 (x minus seven-halves) squared minus StartFraction 27
    15·2 answers
  • A farmer grows x acres of peas and y acres of tomatoes. He has 12 acres available to plant peas and tomatoes. Write an inequalit
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!