<span>The answer is resistance. It is
loosely defined as a client's unwillingness to discuss a particular topic in
therapy.</span>
<span>There are uncountable reasons
why clients can be resistant within a therapeutic relationship. People of all
cultures, natures, and personalities visit psychologists, each with their own
reasons for entering therapy. Some people may be ordered or referred by a third
party to enter therapy. Since they are not there of their own will, these
clients are often unwilling to be there and can show very obvious struggle to
the process. Regardless, many clients show some sort of resistance to the
emotional pain that change demands. Clients can be unwilling and opposed to
change even if it is what they desire, as change can be difficult, emotionally
painful, or scary.</span>
I believe the answer is: management
Strategic management refers to the continuous assessment that we shall always done to ensure that we are accomplishing our goals. This would cover everything starting from the creation of the plan, supervising the plan and evaluation of the plan after the success or failure.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Conscientiousness".
Explanation:
- Trainers, therefore, need to remain fit and healthy and almost always demonstrate up at the right time besides lessons as well as fitness classes that are expected to take place. Individuals ought to synchronize with each other, to encourage each other through fitness training.
- That very personality disorder drives an individual to be doing his/her employees with better performance as well as seriousness. Employees ought to pay serious consideration to any agreements signed to the customers to help others meet their optimal health.
So that the above is the right answer.
Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
