I believe the answer is: Personality test
Personality test refers to the type of test that initiated in order to understand the baseline of behavior that a person would do under normal circumtances.
usually this type of test is being done by making the subject answer a lot of introspective question about their preferred actions on various scenarios.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Article of incorporation, secretary of state of Illinois
Explanation:
Before incorporating the advertising company in Illinois Troy need to have an Article of incorporation. it is a legal document that needs to deposit in the government agency to legalized the incorporation.  
This document includes information like company name, address, agent name, stock information. All this information need to be submitted to government officials and must be approved by the secretary of state of Illinois
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
strengths-based management
Explanation:
 Strengths- based management is a method of maximizing the success, efficiency, and productivity of an organization by focusing on and developing one's strength
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
I think the correct answer would be the third option. The gestalt principle of proximity is the tendency to perceive objects that are close to each other as part of the same grouping. It states that if shapes are close to each other, then you would see them as groups no matter if the sizes and shapes are different from each other as long as they are close to one another. This principle of proximity is one of Gestalts principle which is focused on how every stimulus would be perceived in the most simple form. It is also called as the Law of Simplicity or the Law of Pragnanz. It is based on the principle that the whole has a greater value than its parts.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: A) no damages from the driver 
Explanation:
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE is a defence where a person is ruled to have contributed to whatever injury there may have sustained in the matter at hand, through their own negligence. 
When this happens, the plaintiff is COMPLETELY BARRED from receiving any form of compensation from the Defense.
This is a particularly harsh doctrine that has been abolished in many Common Law countries who instead now follow the COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE approach where the Plaintiff's claim is reduced by the percentage they contributed to the accident. In this case their claim would be reduced by 20% leading to $80,000 being paid by the Defendant.